Those stats. do not look well. There can be no doubt he would be a major risk and that is something we cannot do anymore.
checked his season at Benfica out as well, took over the reigning champions from the previous season - who finished 3 clear of Porto, and finished 3rd with them, 12 points behind Porto (in a 30 game league), following season the new manager also came 3rd - and finished 2 points behind winners Porto.
Overall he has done 'OK' in Dutch football, but failed massively in 2 out of his 3 jobs abroad, and has he really been a massive success at Saints, 14 losses last season, 11 so far this one, dumped out of all cups early twice in a row by Palace in the FA Cup, hamerred by the rs this year 6-1 and beaten last year by Sheff United in the LC, knocked out in the qualifying rounds by Midtjylland in the Uefa.
He is an 'OK' manager, nothing more, he has been around long enough - 19 years in managerial terms that he isn't someone who is going to imrpove dramatically, he is ability wise a Dutch version of Mark Hughes really.
Sorry but he seems to have one 'positive' attached to him in that he likes working with a DoF model, and a lot of other managers may want more control, so basically he may be the 'best' who fits the structure that Moshiri wants to put into place at the club.
Game changing appointment - not for a millisecond, we are hiring a manager who has failed at the 2 biggest clubs he has managed in Valencia and Benfica in a season apiece, and whose greatest achievement is finishing 6th last season and likely 8th this season, it does show the actual level clubs are aspiring towards really.
Koeman is about as exciting a prospect for me as Hughes would be, both proven at the better level to not be up to it, both shown that they can do mid table mediocrity quite well