Talk Sport agrees with him mate.
http://talksport.com/football/lukaku-ps16m-more-sturridge-how-transfer-value-determined-140730104723
Just lol
Not biased of course but within minutes of us signing him (I switched across when the feed died in the hope of hearing the radio questions), they had that up...
Their conclusion on whether Lukaku was a decent value signing... is err all about Liverpool and their quality signings... including dismissing Caroll.
talkSPORT verdict
If we keep all of the factors mentioned above in mind, understanding the wild variations in transfer fees is made slightly easier. Daniel Sturridge may have proven to be twice the player Andy Carroll is, but the £23m between their respective transfer fees is easy to understand if we consider that Carroll’s form was significantly better than Sturridge’s in the seasons prior to the move, Sturridge was signed early in a transfer window while Carroll moved in the dying minutes, and finally, the selling club (Chelsea) was happy to see Sturridge go, while Newcastle had no need to offload Carroll at that particular moment in time, but Liverpool seemed desperate to bring in an additional striker. As for Romelu Lukaku, is £28m a good valuation for 
Everton or Chelsea? Time will tell.