Guilia Bould

Status
Not open for further replies.

She's a journalist for BBC Radio Merseyside. In that capacity she has a relationship with the club. I figure she's a club favoured, journalist. She must be, as she also does match day hosting/announcement stuff.

[Edit] As for the question on how official she is, I figure you could say kinda client journalist. I see her for Everton, kinda like I see Joyce for Liverpool. There's got to be a value in some circumstances to Everton getting word out that's not official, but is. Mark Douglas is another I perceive as almost client journalist.

If you have a look she posted a lot of wrong stuff this summer. Particularly Dibling.

If you see her as what Joyce is for Liverpool as she is for us, I can definitely see how why you had the esk as a mod on here for a while.
 

She's a journalist for BBC Radio Merseyside. In that capacity she has a relationship with the club. I figure she's a club favoured, journalist. She must be, as she also does match day hosting/announcement stuff.

[Edit] As for the question on how official she is, I figure you could say kinda client journalist. I see her for Everton, kinda like I see Joyce for Liverpool. There's got to be a value in some circumstances to Everton getting word out that's not official, but is. Mark Douglas is another I perceive as almost client journalist.
I get that now, if there is an official line that needs getting out, it goes via her - right?
 
AI answers.
You seem to not really be a fan, any evidence for your AI comment?

FWIW I put some of the text into Google Gemini and its assessment was

“ Based on the text you provided, it's highly likely that it was written by a human or is a polished piece of journalism/sports commentary.

Why it seems human-written:

Figurative Language and Opinion: The text uses phrases like "a sign of things to come," "running of the club has seen the situation go in the opposite direction," and "Without a crystal ball it is impossible to answer." This kind of subjective, metaphorical language is typical of human sports writing.

Narrative Flow and Tone: It builds a narrative around David Moyes's history with Everton, his current success with West Ham, and the emotional connection ("He united the fans and restored some pride"). AI-generated text can often be drier or too transactional when summarizing facts.

Smooth Integration of Quotes: The direct quote from Moyes is seamlessly integrated to support the emotional point being made ("this club felt like... broken, felt broken – and it doesn't feel like that any more").

Nuance: It discusses the past, present, and future ("The next step is turn that passion into a trophy") and weighs the manager's personal desire against the practical need for a "rebuild."

In summary: While current AI models are very sophisticated and can mimic human writing well, this text has the specific flair, subjective commentary, and passion typically found in good human sports reporting.
 
You seem to not really be a fan, any evidence for your AI comment?

FWIW I put some of the text into Google Gemini and its assessment was

“ Based on the text you provided, it's highly likely that it was written by a human or is a polished piece of journalism/sports commentary.

Why it seems human-written:

Figurative Language and Opinion: The text uses phrases like "a sign of things to come," "running of the club has seen the situation go in the opposite direction," and "Without a crystal ball it is impossible to answer." This kind of subjective, metaphorical language is typical of human sports writing.

Narrative Flow and Tone: It builds a narrative around David Moyes's history with Everton, his current success with West Ham, and the emotional connection ("He united the fans and restored some pride"). AI-generated text can often be drier or too transactional when summarizing facts.

Smooth Integration of Quotes: The direct quote from Moyes is seamlessly integrated to support the emotional point being made ("this club felt like... broken, felt broken – and it doesn't feel like that any more").

Nuance: It discusses the past, present, and future ("The next step is turn that passion into a trophy") and weighs the manager's personal desire against the practical need for a "rebuild."

In summary: While current AI models are very sophisticated and can mimic human writing well, this text has the specific flair, subjective commentary, and passion typically found in good human sports reporting.
Just call him a misogynistic gobshite and lash him on ignore.

Fella's a complete tosser
 

If you have a look she posted a lot of wrong stuff this summer. Particularly Dibling.

If you see her as what Joyce is for Liverpool as she is for us, I can definitely see how why you had the esk as a mod on here for a while.

Learned who she is since Sunday have you pal?

I don't think she got "a lot of stuff wrong this summer" - I think she put out what she got from the club/what the club wanted putting out;



That was true at the time it was shared.

Esk was a great mod, you perhaps wouldn't know - you joined 5+ years after that.
 
What’s her job, is she a genuine mouth piece for the club or just ITK?

She seems to be an semi official person who I giving the inside information on the club.

She has been since the summer really. She was contrarian on the progress of a couple of our transfer targets, which was clearly spoonfed statements from the club.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top