Under The Lights
ORDER NOW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
And more than likely too little
How many points deducted are we looking at? Just so I can brace myself, mentally.
We took the full 14 days.
Some cheek of Forest to claim that they had no sporting advantage, especially in the context of our judgements, but just to say that it's definitely 'inferred' for Forest as well. That doesn't mean the same thing as conjecture.Not just that mate, Johnson actually played & helped them win a game of football after the date they could have sold him to be under the limit and have no breach - it’s the very definition of sporting advantage.
That’s not to say I agree with any clubs having to sell players for less than they feel they are worth, just to fit some mandatory accounting period nonsense, because I don’t, but this sporting advantage cack really does my head in - it was inferred and conjecture against us, but we get a bigger deduction than a team who actually signed loads of players for mad money and kept one too long to get more money?!?
There’s zero logic to any of this crap.
It’s not inferred for forest, it’s fact.Some cheek of Forest to claim that they had no sporting advantage, especially in the context of our judgements, but just to say that it's definitely 'inferred' for Forest as well. That doesn't mean the same thing as conjecture.
He blocked me ages ago for correcting his untruths, fellas an absolute whopper. He’s having a go a Guilia Bould now the little rat.Seems to spend all day every day arguing on twitter or occasionally chatting on Talksport.
Can't help thinking the real leading experts on these matters are actually working, and are actually in the rooms where these things take place rather than sitting at home in their pants "analysing" them.
Just enough to put Us and Forest back where we both were football wise yesterday.How many points deducted are we looking at? Just so I can brace myself, mentally.
I mean every time the report mentions it it uses the word infer. I think it's a ridiculous phrase as well, and quite honestly it's been used horribly by everyone throughout this sorry business. But I can't see how it's not the same for any of our players who we could've sold and didn't sell?It’s not inferred for forest, it’s fact.
They were scratching about trying to say we had a sporting advantage when we clearly didn’t.
That’s fair comment although at 3.5 they touch on two levels but you are right.If you read the two sections I screenshotted then no that is not the "only way it can be read" at all. There is no mention of a minor breach involving the lower threshold at all. There is discussion of how an IC might treat a minor breach, so obviously they contemplate it would be charged, otherwise the point would be moot. They define a "significant breach" as being one tens of millions over the upper threshold so it would be reasonably to define a minor one as £1 - £10 million over the same threshold.
Still got their vitamin D.Paying for flights for the IC, sure he’s got them a lovely Greek villa for a few days while they considered the punishment.
Best we could offer was a pint in the Lisbon, hence the disparity in points deductions.