6 + 2 Point Deductions

[mahermi1]

Allright lads, Forest fan here, I get you boys want us to have more points off and I get why,

But isn't all this points deduction stuff a load of rubbish, I don't want to see anyone deducted points around us, even if it benefits us, the state of the Premier League honestly

Picked a nice time to show up on here mate, but you're wrong by the way, we just want less points deducted than what we have. Good luck to you btw, but our smaller breach should have meant a smaller punishment not more.

 

[DualityNSNO]

Are you sure?

I think so, but it seems others don't.

 

[matty1878]

What's a load of rubbish is your club crying and saying we were worse then them.

Also forest fans singing about us being corrupt yet you breached nearly twice what we did... not singing now are you..

they’ve got of better then us..

so yearh they’re singing HA HA @ everton

 

[BlueShark]

The PL are going to hit us with another 4 points deduction aren't they.

 

[Bungle]

they’ve got of better then us..

so yearh they’re singing HA HA @ everton

That's not particularly catchy Matthew

 

[DualityNSNO]

The PL are going to hit us with another 4 points deduction aren't they.

Why not 5 though?

 

[Davideeyore]

Martin Ziegler (Martin with a Y) basically saying it's because Everton provided wrong information. That FOREST got less. Forgive me but first why should any issue surrounding Everton influence how the Independent commission charge Forest?

Secondly, I'm not sure Everton gave incorrect information but what the appeal panel said was even if Everton had not provided the right information it was not for them (PL) to basically speak of as that wasn't their remit.

Thirdly, Everton were cleared of any intentional errors weren't we? The PL speaking of good faith and Everton were cleared of it so why on earth are Forest getting less points than us under this scenario?

Or are they saying well We might have got 3 points but because we provided wrong information that we got 6?

All of this is daft, and pathetic.

What Everton did say both with the original charge and the appeal, that they would monitor other clubs. I suppose with one eye on City. And one on Forest.

Everton should be up in arms about this.

 

[Melchizedek]

Compare that Forest statement to ours after the appeal. We'd had to play for 4 months with a 10 point deduction, reduced to 6 and look at the clubs response...

Satisfied. Particularly pleased. Positive outcome.

View attachment 249202

Our club didn't care about us getting the deduction, only that the PL said that we weren't acting in the most upright way possible. After the appeals IC said we had been good boys and cooperated in good faith, the club considered that job done.

 

[ashwuk76]

That's not particularly catchy Matthew

All i can picture is Nelson in a forest shirt pointing at us saying that...

 

[matty1878]

forest back into the mire is interesting because the pressure goes up a notch and they're battling with luton at the moment. Should it be between those two, it means one will hopefully be fodder next season. Lets say Leicester, leeds and Ipswich up for next season.

they? mate were bang smack in the middle

 

[Wat Tyler]

tea lady will prob do a statement soon

She’s been headlocked as well?

 

[Evertonthat]

The PL are going to hit us with another 4 points deduction aren't they.

They will probably try and hit us with 6 again. Remember they wanted to give us 12 in the first place, so it wouldn't surprise me if that's the total we end up with

 

[matty1878]

Martin Ziegler (Martin with a Y) basically saying it's because Everton provided wrong information. That FOREST got less. Forgive me but first why should any issue surrounding Everton influence how the Independent commission charge Forest?

Secondly, I'm not sure Everton gave incorrect information but what the appeal panel said was even if Everton had not provided the right information it was not for them (PL) to basically speak of as that wasn't their remit.

Thirdly, Everton were cleared of any intentional errors weren't we? The PL speaking of good faith and Everton were cleared of it so why on earth are Forest getting less points than us under this scenario?

Or are they saying well We might have got 3 points but because we provided wrong information that we got 6?

All of this is daft, and pathetic.

What Everton did say both with the original charge and the appeal, that they would monitor other clubs. I suppose with one eye on City. And one on Forest.

Everton should be up in arms about this.

“should”

we have no owners mate nobody cares

 

[Ring master]

The PL are going to hit us with another 4 points deduction aren't they.

Dont know if i am reading it right, as It seems to be make up on the fly, but seems like its an auto 3points as a starting point

 

[Dixieslaces]

Our club didn't care about us getting the deduction, only that the PL said that we weren't acting in the most upright way possible. After the appeals IC said we had been good boys and cooperated in good faith, the club considered that job done.

Shows the state of the club for me.

Many have said.

We are being dry bummed aa we ain't a set of Kahunas to go at em.

Fuming