Statement of Intent

Status
Not open for further replies.

bluestevon

Player Valuation: £80m
How to start without this sounding like another Football Manager inspired piece of fluff writing.

Well let's start at the beginning

We have a new owner, one who accoriding to an ever increasing amount of media reports, wishes to not only put a fair bit of investment into the team, but to completely change the nature of how Everton are viewed, not only inside football circles themselves, but also on a much wider base, the aim being to make us an attractive vehicle for commercial deals from companies that wish to hitch their vehicles to us.

How is this achievable?

Firstly - a new stadium, but that comes with the caveat of no matter how quickly it can be done and how high profile the new stadium is, that it will still take time - minimum of three years if everything goes smoothly, second - new commercial deals, yet again we are in a short term timescale at least tied into most of these deals, so yer again will take time for them to expire and for us to be able to negotiate on our terms, various parts of the commercial side of the club have been moved out of house and need to be brought back in house, so yet again this will all take time to achieve.

So whilst waiting for all the above to happen, Mr Moshiri is left with the conundrum of what to do now, and strange as it may sound, the delays on the ideas i have just mentioned can be seen also as a positive, because what they enable us to do is to raise the profile of the club and the marketability of it in the meantime, the easiest way for this to be done is by overhauling the PR side of the club, which i believe we will be in the process of doing - and maybe are already seeing the results of that with the new directors actions thus far. The other way is by makings us for want of a better word a 'sexy' club one that has the average joe bloggs with no real strong allegiance flick the match on when we are playing over choosing another game, be that a guy sitting in his 5 bedroom house in Devon, or a group of lads gathered outside a bar in India or Thailand etc

So how to make us Sexy...

Raise the profile of the club through a statement signing, or several of these, various names have been bandied about, most of whom whilst very good footballers will not exactly have the likes of Nike and such rushing to throw big fat deals at us, to a football purest they may make sense, Scneiderlein, Witsel etc are all very good footballers, but are they a 'statement' - the short answer is no, they will improve the team, they will move us up the league, but they won't change a thing on the grander scale of how we are perceived.

So what type of big name signing can we make, what is a realistic 'statement' - who can we attract, and why would they come? and who would make a difference on a global scale - which is what Moshiri is aiming for.

Before getting into naming names, we have to think about the finances of the club right at this minute and make a few assumntions on what we have and what will happen shortly

As @The Esk has stated in several other threads, we will look to raise our wage structure by at least 35-40m this season over the currently allowed amount of 7m allowed by the premiership FPP rules, and we are in a situation that the money is their for whatever we can attract to us, so say a estimate of a 150m transfer budget (high end estimate), to allow us to move the wage structure of the club up sevral notches, we will need to sell Stones for example, so overall the budget will be more in the region of 200m to spend, and with a 47m increase in the wages we pay per season allowed - which tarnslates to a 904k increase in wages across the club.

So here we are, sat with 200m to spend and with 900k pw we can spend on incoming players, let's add to this total with players already departed or who are likely to depart in the near future (yet more assumptions i know), Osman, Hibbert, Pienaar, Howard - 160k pw, Stones, Cleverley, McGeady, Kone and Naisse (loan) - frees up another 200k pw and liklely brings in about 10m in added fees on top of Stones.

So we are left with 210m and 1.26m per week in wages we can offer incoming players now, when you look at those figures they are mind blowing, but by all accounts they are what we will be dealing with this summer in all likelihood shoudl Moshiri manage to do what he has set out to do (and given his record so far - we shouldn't doubt he will manage what he sets out for)

Say Lukaku and Ross resign for massive improved deals, and across the squad in general a fair few new and improved contracts are given out, which wipes out 260k pw and in doing so sets the bar for wages at a massively higher total - 140k pw for Lukaku, 100-110k pw for Barkley etc

and now let's say we get a few of the players we have been linked with in - the likes of Strootman (20m), Witsel (25m) and we go for Butland (30m) and VVD (30m), we buy Milik or Janssen for 15m

thats 120m spent, and probably looking at around 500k in wages (again a generous estimate)

leaves the club with 90m and 500k in wages still burning a hole in our lovely Iranians pocket, but no statement signing, just some very good ones that will make the team very competitive, say we then blow a 30m bid on Perisic (current flavour of the month after his Euro exploits and also a position we depserately need sorting) and we give him parity with rom on wages - so another 140k and 30m gone

we are then left with a 60m and 360 pw situation, to go out their and target a 'statement' signing for the club to propel us into the spotlight, go throw that at Madrid, offer them their asking price for James Rodriguez and see what they actually say when we slap the money on the table, and see what his agent says when we offer to double his current 110k pw wages.

Honestly it sounds mental even typing this out, but money talks in football, and if we are serious in making a statement then we couldn't make a bigger on than this
 
How to start without this sounding like another Football Manager inspired piece of fluff writing.

Well let's start at the beginning

We have a new owner, one who accoriding to an ever increasing amount of media reports, wishes to not only put a fair bit of investment into the team, but to completely change the nature of how Everton are viewed, not only inside football circles themselves, but also on a much wider base, the aim being to make us an attractive vehicle for commercial deals from companies that wish to hitch their vehicles to us.

How is this achievable?

Firstly - a new stadium, but that comes with the caveat of no matter how quickly it can be done and how high profile the new stadium is, that it will still take time - minimum of three years if everything goes smoothly, second - new commercial deals, yet again we are in a short term timescale at least tied into most of these deals, so yer again will take time for them to expire and for us to be able to negotiate on our terms, various parts of the commercial side of the club have been moved out of house and need to be brought back in house, so yet again this will all take time to achieve.

So whilst waiting for all the above to happen, Mr Moshiri is left with the conundrum of what to do now, and strange as it may sound, the delays on the ideas i have just mentioned can be seen also as a positive, because what they enable us to do is to raise the profile of the club and the marketability of it in the meantime, the easiest way for this to be done is by overhauling the PR side of the club, which i believe we will be in the process of doing - and maybe are already seeing the results of that with the new directors actions thus far. The other way is by makings us for want of a better word a 'sexy' club one that has the average joe bloggs with no real strong allegiance flick the match on when we are playing over choosing another game, be that a guy sitting in his 5 bedroom house in Devon, or a group of lads gathered outside a bar in India or Thailand etc

So how to make us Sexy...

Raise the profile of the club through a statement signing, or several of these, various names have been bandied about, most of whom whilst very good footballers will not exactly have the likes of Nike and such rushing to throw big fat deals at us, to a football purest they may make sense, Scneiderlein, Witsel etc are all very good footballers, but are they a 'statement' - the short answer is no, they will improve the team, they will move us up the league, but they won't change a thing on the grander scale of how we are perceived.

So what type of big name signing can we make, what is a realistic 'statement' - who can we attract, and why would they come? and who would make a difference on a global scale - which is what Moshiri is aiming for.

Before getting into naming names, we have to think about the finances of the club right at this minute and make a few assumntions on what we have and what will happen shortly

As @The Esk has stated in several other threads, we will look to raise our wage structure by at least 35-40m this season over the currently allowed amount of 7m allowed by the premiership FPP rules, and we are in a situation that the money is their for whatever we can attract to us, so say a estimate of a 150m transfer budget (high end estimate), to allow us to move the wage structure of the club up sevral notches, we will need to sell Stones for example, so overall the budget will be more in the region of 200m to spend, and with a 47m increase in the wages we pay per season allowed - which tarnslates to a 904k increase in wages across the club.

So here we are, sat with 200m to spend and with 900k pw we can spend on incoming players, let's add to this total with players already departed or who are likely to depart in the near future (yet more assumptions i know), Osman, Hibbert, Pienaar, Howard - 160k pw, Stones, Cleverley, McGeady, Kone and Naisse (loan) - frees up another 200k pw and liklely brings in about 10m in added fees on top of Stones.

So we are left with 210m and 1.26m per week in wages we can offer incoming players now, when you look at those figures they are mind blowing, but by all accounts they are what we will be dealing with this summer in all likelihood shoudl Moshiri manage to do what he has set out to do (and given his record so far - we shouldn't doubt he will manage what he sets out for)

Say Lukaku and Ross resign for massive improved deals, and across the squad in general a fair few new and improved contracts are given out, which wipes out 260k pw and in doing so sets the bar for wages at a massively higher total - 140k pw for Lukaku, 100-110k pw for Barkley etc

and now let's say we get a few of the players we have been linked with in - the likes of Strootman (20m), Witsel (25m) and we go for Butland (30m) and VVD (30m), we buy Milik or Janssen for 15m

thats 120m spent, and probably looking at around 500k in wages (again a generous estimate)

leaves the club with 90m and 500k in wages still burning a hole in our lovely Iranians pocket, but no statement signing, just some very good ones that will make the team very competitive, say we then blow a 30m bid on Perisic (current flavour of the month after his Euro exploits and also a position we depserately need sorting) and we give him parity with rom on wages - so another 140k and 30m gone

we are then left with a 60m and 360 pw situation, to go out their and target a 'statement' signing for the club to propel us into the spotlight, go throw that at Madrid, offer them their asking price for James Rodriguez and see what they actually say when we slap the money on the table, and see what his agent says when we offer to double his current 110k pw wages.

Honestly it sounds mental even typing this out, but money talks in football, and if we are serious in making a statement then we couldn't make a bigger on than this
First him. Then any left overs for others...

image.jpeg
 
First him. Then any left overs for others...

View attachment 25575

Thing is mate, as i said in the original post, it sounds mental - and maybe it is, but financially we can actualy easily do so now, the fee, the wages - all doable, the bringing in of a set of players with enough quality that the team becomes a completely different proposition to attract a huge name player - all doable.

the big what if, would be - can we attract him over other teams, and basically that then becomes a question of - are we willing to just go out their and outbid anyone else interested in him, United offer 50m and 150k pw wages, we offer 60m and 200k pw to the lad, Madrid will sell to the highest bidder - they always have operated like that, the player himself has previously moved almost entirely for the money when he went to Monaco (who could be argued at the time did exactly what we want to do, bought him for a high profile glamour signign to put themselves on the map (yeah didnt end well but thats a different owner and different league)

The situation has many parallels with Robinho, only we are starting from a better base and with a better and higher profile manager than they did
 

So the tl'dr of this is. Play real life football manager.

To all intents and purposes mate, a billionaire new owner who is willing to by all estimates throw 100-150m into the team and who wants to smash the wage structure to pieces and increase the wages we are allowed to pay by over 40m this season, isn't he doing exactly that?
 
Apart from seeing him in the World Cup I honestly haven't followed him at Real Madrid, is he any good?

Can't see how we can make a "statement" signing when most if not all the best players will want to be playing Champion's League. I'm worried that we may need to get 4th or a very close 5th to attract the really top players.
The only players I can imagine us attracting are those close to the end of their careers and are world renowned like Rooney or Ibra for example.
 
Apart from seeing him in the World Cup I honestly haven't followed him at Real Madrid, is he any good?

Can't see how we can make a "statement" signing when most if not all the best players will want to be playing Champion's League. I'm worried that we may need to get 4th or a very close 5th to attract the really top players.
The only players I can imagine us attracting are those close to the end of their careers and are world renowned like Rooney or Ibra for example.
Ibra for a season would be a statement of intent. He would undoubtedly raise the profile of the club. And because there is no transfer fee involved, we could afford his 200k a week wages.
 
I dont see the logic of selling Stones to fund a bid for a "statement" signing.

Stones is potentially a golden ticket into global marketing of the club and looks like being a world class player.
Stones is going to be sold to ease the FFP stress we face, regardless of a statement signing. Unless we find some other solution?
 

I dont see the logic of selling Stones to fund a bid for a "statement" signing.

Stones is potentially a golden ticket into global marketing of the club and looks like being a world class player.

Name one centre back that has ever been a global marketing 'star' mate?

Plus read the esks posts thoroughly mate, he explains exactly whay selling someone like Stones may be vital

We keep stones we can basically add players to the wage bill totalling rouhgly 135k extra a week.

We lose stones for 40m, we are able to add players to the wage bill totalling 905k extra per week.

It really is that simple a scenario

Players who have already left the clubs wages will be eaten up with new contracts given out to the likes of Lukaku and Barkley - and that would be another 80k or so we'd have to give if Stones also stayed, so likely around 200k for those three extra to resign deals

We'd even after shifting a few players extra be left with around 200k wiggle room for new players coming in unless we sell
 
Stones is going to be sold to ease the FFP stress we face, regardless of a statement signing. Unless we find some other solution?

All honesty - i think Stones leaving is the plan now, if we did some dodgy sponsorship deals to get us to that figure - then all it does is create the situation wher we jump this season then flatline out wage wise as we won't have any room to increase sponsorships further for a long whilst - we sell stones, then we take the same jump, then as commercial deals are vastly improved we take another leap up, think thats been the plan from the start really and it is the more sustainable of the scenarios
 
Name one centre back that has ever been a global marketing 'star' mate?

Plus read the esks posts thoroughly mate, he explains exactly whay selling someone like Stones may be vital

We keep stones we can basically add players to the wage bill totalling rouhgly 135k extra a week.

We lose stones for 40m, we are able to add players to the wage bill totalling 905k extra per week.

It really is that simple a scenario

Players who have already left the clubs wages will be eaten up with new contracts given out to the likes of Lukaku and Barkley - and that would be another 80k or so we'd have to give if Stones also stayed, so likely around 200k for those three extra to resign deals

We'd even after shifting a few players extra be left with around 200k wiggle room for new players coming in unless we sell


We dont need £905k a week in wages freed up.

May as well sell aquad players.

Rio Ferdinand was a global marketing dream...hugely popular in japan for example where everyone called him LEO.
 
We dont need £905k a week in wages freed up.

May as well sell aquad players.

Rio Ferdinand was a global marketing dream...hugely popular in japan for example where everyone called him LEO.
Stones clearly doesn't want to be here. I want him to stay as much as you, but if we are to rebuild to the degree Mr Moshiri desires, then we'll have minimum 140m to spend on transfers immediately and the wage space to accommodate going forward over the next few seasons.
 
Name one centre back that has ever been a global marketing 'star' mate?

Plus read the esks posts thoroughly mate, he explains exactly whay selling someone like Stones may be vital

We keep stones we can basically add players to the wage bill totalling rouhgly 135k extra a week.

We lose stones for 40m, we are able to add players to the wage bill totalling 905k extra per week.

It really is that simple a scenario

Players who have already left the clubs wages will be eaten up with new contracts given out to the likes of Lukaku and Barkley - and that would be another 80k or so we'd have to give if Stones also stayed, so likely around 200k for those three extra to resign deals

We'd even after shifting a few players extra be left with around 200k wiggle room for new players coming in unless we sell

maldini, ramos, rio, Beckenbauer, terry
 

We dont need £905k a week in wages freed up.

May as well sell aquad players.

Rio Ferdinand was a global marketing dream...hugely popular in japan for example where everyone called him LEO.

So Zat you would rather shift a few squad players on, although exatly how much we'd raise for such players is debatable, especially in terms of us needing to make trading profits on them and the difficulty and time it would take to move on these players alos, which basically will mean we can't buy until we sell - otherwise run a risk of failing the FPP rules which would end in disaster and a fire sale at the last minute

and bring in a couple of new faces - likely not spenidng much more than say 30-40m at an absolute maximum - as we will NOT be able to afford wages above that net spend

or would you rather lose a player who plainly wants out the club, which would enable us to say spend 200m and be able to offer contracts on par with what the 'SKY' clubs can do - and be able to bring in the exact targets 6-7 players that Koeman wants?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top