Under The Lights
ORDER NOW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Disappointed that you would make a joke of 9/11
Are they happy to play under him though? We may find out in the summer.Or keep the manager who brought these players to the club and are happy to play under him and try and build something sustainable and for the future?
Well, no - when people cite his second season as a reason to sack him it's only fair to cite his first season.
And, in all honesty, that season was so mental. Dave's right in one thing at least in that 72 points is huge - and in any other season would have got us top four if not top three.
Heck, this season, the team that wins it may only get to 75...
Are they happy to play under him though? We may find out in the summer.
As far as I can see, Stones has already tried to force a move once, Baines, Osman, Garbutt, Barry, Lukaku and now Coleman have all thrown him under the bus with comments to the press, Mirallas allegedly threw something at him at the weekend and it's clear that Naismith, Distin, Eto'o, McGeady etc weren't happy before they left.
I'm not saying it's an unhappy camp as such, these things happen at all clubs. I do think, though, that the idea of all the players loving the manager and wanting to play under him are pretty far fetched and seemingly without an awful lot of foundation.
I'm not interpreting anything though.You've effectively summarized your own interpretation
I know mate, even Wigan are ahead of the curve in recovering from phenomenalismThink things are gonna get worse before it gets better
The fact that 72 points in one season didn't get a CL spot, whilst 61 points did in another season is not proof that the latter effort was better. That's a contradiction no matter how much you feed it through the mangle of 'pounding dross' and 'not pounding dross'.It's all relative though. Moyes getting 61 points and fourth place is a better league performance than 72 points and fifth. It was also better than when Moyes secured our previous record but came fifth. The reason is because relatively in comparison to the other 19 sides in the league we've done better in 04/05 than we have in 13/14.
It's great setting a points record that 'any other season' would be top 4. The key point being it wasn't that season. You saw Liverpool setting their prem record, Arsenal polling 79(?) points and a Chelsea side without a decent striker getting 83 points. All the high points total show is a disparity between the top sides and the bottom ones. So all the good teams pounded the dross that year and we were fifth by 7 points in the end. Clearly this wasn't the case in 04/05. We out performed 16 other teams so deservedly took 4th spot. We couldn't do that in 13/14. Incidentally if you look at United's tally in 7th place that season it is far above what the 7th team this year will probably poll. In a concertined league a lower points total would have us sitting in the top 4, it's obviously more difficult to get.
The fact that 72 points in one season didn't get a CL spot, whilst 61 points did in another season is not proof that the latter effort was better. That's a contradiction no matter how much you feed it through the mangle of 'pounding dross' and 'not pounding dross'.
It's tortuous and vacuous to suggest there are any circumstances whereby winning 11 more points in one season is a worse effort. That equates to three wins and a couple of more draws. It's off the charts daft to suggest the 72 points season wasn't a better effort. It just was.
The fact that 72 points in one season didn't get a CL spot, whilst 61 points did in another season is not proof that the latter effort was better. That's a contradiction no matter how much you feed it through the mangle of 'pounding dross' and 'not pounding dross'.
It's tortuous and vacuous to suggest there are any circumstances whereby winning 11 more points in one season is a worse effort. That equates to three wins and a couple of more draws. It's off the charts daft to suggest the 72 points season wasn't a better effort. It just was.
Pipe down. 8 losses in the 35 games we've played this season.8 wins from 26 games.
Keep dressing that up as much as you want David, but its simply not good enough, it doesnt matter what we did 2 years ago, it doesnt matter what we did in 1985, it doesnt even matter what we do next season. This season we have won.
8 wins in 26 games = A win every 3.25 games
Last season we won
12 wins in 38 games = A win every 3.16 games
Quite grim reading.
Martinez isnt on trial for the season he got right, hes on trial for the SEASONS hes got wrong.
Pipe down. 8 losses in the 35 games we've played this season.
That's a loss less than every four games.
You're welcome.
"On trial" for getting to the SF of a cup and later stages of the other one and scoring 46 goals in the league and playing football touched by the Gods.
I bet he's bricking it wondering whether he's got a job here next season.
*roars with laughter*
Pipe down. 8 losses in the 35 games we've played this season.
That's a loss less than every four games.
You're welcome.
"On trial" for getting to the SF of a cup and later stages of the other one and scoring 46 goals in the league and playing football touched by the Gods.
I bet he's bricking it wondering whether he's got a job here next season.
*roars with laughter*
Pipe down. 8 losses in the 35 games we've played this season.
That's a loss less than every four games.