Would you rather have bad guys in the team if it means we win more?

[Tobin]

Don't worry about what other teams think lad, they're only other teams.

I hear we did well today even though we got a draw and had more of ball. Just looking at the Stats on BBC sports. That was without Gibson and Pienaar.

 

[BirkenheadBlue]

If Suarez played for us, I'd want him sold asap, to be replaced with someone we could have pride in.

Can't believe more RS fans don't feel the same. He's a quality player, but he's a stain on their club.

 

[mstan]

I like to win, but if we played like Suarez I would be ashamed to call myself an everton fan

 

[Fensta]

We have been lucky that Moyes has never signed anyone as hateable as ratface. I would refuse to support the team if we had scum like that playing for us.

 

[SteveRochester]

I think a fair few of us would take issue with Felli if he played for the ****e, he's been known to throw a few elbows for the cause.

 

[Groucho]

I would rather have an honest hard man who may sometimes be wrongdoing, but doesn't try to hide it, than have a cheating, diving, back-stabbing, slimey, horrible little div ANYDAY.

 

[HSD]

I hate the 'bad guys' in football. I personally don't think they deserve to be footballers regardless of their skill because they're meant to be examples and the amount they get paid for the way they are.... hmm.

 

[Paul_Mc7]

In a time of insane money, classless antics and shameless cheating, one thing that makes me proud is how Everton almost always fly under the radar because we are the exact opposite. We do things the right way, and that will always matter more than anything to REAL football supporters.

 

[Woolly Blue]

Cheese on toast.
I don't want cheats playing for us but a bit more snidiness wouldn't go amiss sometimes.

 

[King Max Old]

Timmy Cahill was one of the cheekiest, hardest players, especially in derbies. He would rile up opposition, nudge, pinch, and get them worked up before popping in a trademark header.
Lots of non-Evertonians thought he was a cheat- me, i disagree- but it just shows its a matter of opinion often. However there's a distinct difference between your biting bulldog type player and Suarez the despicable racist diving biting cheating lying [Poor language removed].

 

[EvertonAndAustralia]

In all honesty I'd take Gerrard and Skrtel but not that diving racist prick.

 

[GrandOldParty]

Ha, very skewed poll that is. Don't think it reflects anyone's views deep down inside.

Suarez, Ronaldo, Drogba, Pepe, Terry etc can all be viewed as examples of the so called "bad guys" and I'd have any of them in our team in a heartbeat. I don't think i'd believe anyone who says that they'd rather have a hard-working, honest but average player in their squad than someone like the above mentioned.

Face it, it's what football has become. The game's vastly changed and run by money now and we just can't compete with that, and if having a "bad guy" or guys in our team would significantly increase our chances of success, then that'll do for me.

 

[Tobin]

In all honesty I'd take Gerrard and Skrtel but not that diving racist prick.

I would rather take Fowler than Suarez and that's me being generous.

 

[McBain]

Yep, going against the grain here...we may not like it, but Good Guys do finish last.

Love him or hate him, Suarez is an absolute weapon, and in a awful team we should have beat, he looked like hurting us every time he got the ball.

 

[Kay20]

Yep, going against the grain here...we may not like it, but Good Guys do finish last.

Love him or hate him, Suarez is an absolute weapon, and in a awful team we should have beat, he looked like hurting us every time he got the ball.

And he is an absolute tool. I have zero interest in being embarrassed by my team. And he embarrasses the team he plays for. As a teammate, I would give him the widest birth possible. I have no idea how he hasn't turned into a locker room cancer. Probably shows the make up of that team right now.