Would you offer Phil Neville a one year contract in January?

Status
Not open for further replies.
He is the shittest player in the squad. He brings absolutely nothing to the team on the pitch or to the wider squad in general.

Yeah, he may have looked alright when he was playing alongside Gibson at the end of last year and we were snotting teams 4-0, but if you remove Gibson from the team he is totally shit. No other player looks descent alongside Gibson but turns to shit when he is injured, only Neville does this.

He is absolute dog turd, and for this reason I'd be reluctant to sanction even a 10k a week contract for him. It's about time that he stepped down and started playing at a level that he is comfortable at, like League 2 or something.

Do you really understand anything about football ??
 
Im sorry, but I read this part of his interview in a slightly different way....with him bieng from Bury and all....



"I've got my A licence now, I go to games and study methods and read a lot. I've always been into the fitness side, my [twin] sister's a conditioning coach so I tap into that"
 
Do you not think he played well against United?

Everyone played well against United. Neville wasn't one of the better performers.

And singular performances aren't really a good yard stick for any player, never mind a defensive one. It's about consistency and as I said before, although he plays in defensive roles they are roles where some offensive threat is really required. It's not that he doesn't get into the final third, it's that when he does he is utterly useless. That's putting ourselves at a willing disadvantage.

new-picture-14.png


That chart shows players touches against Villa. As you can see Neville had a fair few (bigger font = more touches). More than Naismith in fact, and as many it seems as Fellaini. Now we were on the front foot all that game, and Neville was useless in that department. His crosses are awful, he has no vision and he can't pass beyond 5 yards. He also has no pace and when pressed with the ball he panics as he has no real skill or ball control. I know we won that game but Neville was pretty much a passenger, and I can't help but think in similar games -- or any game where we're not on the back foot 90% of the time -- that someone with offensive abilities either in CM or at RB would be a better asset.

I'm happy with him as cover, but he will never be just cover under Moyes. He's started every game so far and we started the season injury free. I miss the days where we had an in form Arteta at the centre of our team. That was great. Seeing Neville on the ball there just makes me sad.

Against United, as you implied, he did indeed play well but he was asked to do a massively defensive role. We had to defend a lot in that game even if it didn't seem like it with their lack of clear cut opportunities. But in most games we do not have to do that. When we need to break a team down having Neville at the heart of our team is like playing with 10 men. Against West Brom this was fairly evident.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top