Sapie88
Hi @Donald Twain
Imagine a striker missing sitters every game, he'd be dropped immediately.
- Status
BlueLlama
10/11/17 TWAIN CRUSH DAY
Or instead of walking towards the ball to kick it wondering out the way or watch it going sailing past him?
RFUS
Anustart
Robles. Give him the rest of the season. If he continues like the last few games then he needs replacing as number 1, but give him the chance to prove that it's a confidence blip that he can overcome. There's nothing to gain by playing Stekelenburg.
Robles has had a bad 5+ weeks whereas Stek has had a bad 5+ years.
Robles has had a bad 5+ weeks whereas Stek has had a bad 5+ years.
Sapie88
Hi @Donald Twain
The fella is a clown but because he did better than Howard he's meant to be a suitable number 1 for a team with top 4 aspirations.
Madness.
Furey1878
Player Valuation: £70m
I agree Joel isn't top 4 standard. I think he's a solid enough PL keeper though.
The point is though, would you prioritise a big money keeper signing over any of the following:
1. Backup Striker (assuming Lukaku stays)
2. Right Back
3. Centre Back
4. Attacking Midfielder
?
Personally I wouldn't
Denis Lawrence
..didn't know it was in doubt that Robles would start.
The binman chronicles
Player Valuation: £80m
Just play with 11 outfield players and leave it unguarded. Basically what we do now but least we will have an extra man to help keep/win back possession. 
Why's this even up for debate?
Totally agree with you mate,but i do think we need a new quality keeper if we are to get into top 4 next season and id keep Joel for number 2
No point playing Stekky now, might as well let Robles have it for the rest of the season in the hope he shows something to suggest he should have the job full time. Good as Stekky can be, he isn't ever going to be #1 for us, so might as well gives Robles the office and see if he steps up after a couple of poor displays
Osamabindiesel
Player Valuation: £60m
The whole forum wants him gone for that lulz
- Status
