TV Series

I just spent the entire first two episodes of Chernobyl gently shaking my head from time to time at the shocking mistakes and incompetence on display as the disaster unfolded.

Not only a great watch but a history lesson, the best type of TV is that.
This incompetence and the disregard for safety stems directly from the view that the ideology must prevail, beyond all other considerations - dogma above all else!

Where do you start when attributing blame? The design of the reactor and its inherent flaws compared to Western counterparts, built for speed and ease?

Suppressing the issues raised at Leningrad by the KGB et al. that would ultimately induce the final catastrophe? Nonchalant leadership in and above the plant?

Completing the test with such lack of regard for safety protocols and with a staff that did not really have either the knowledge or experience? Anatoly Dyatlov?

The ineptitude of the initial response and reluctance to accept that there was an issue? Like with the workers in the plant, this is not a criticism of the responders.

Rather, it is an open criticism of the leadership and the political system above it, that not only allowed this style of control, but actually let it thrive.

In episode 2, Shcherbina said something along the lines of, "Because it must be done" to the brave divers. But was it not this view that also allowed such failings?

It must be done, regardless of the actual cost. I read about a Soviet nuclear powered plane in the 1950s which worked, whereas the US and UK couldn't.

It baffled them how it was done successfully? It was done successfully because the reactor had little to no shielding (a massive extra weight) to weigh it down.
 
In episode 2, Shcherbina said something along the lines of, "Because it must be done" to the brave divers. But was it not this view that also allowed such failings?

Before you could say they had an alternative and picked the wrong option. With regard to the divers it was really a case of it must be done. Likewise with the miners digging under the plant to install the heat exchanger, even though it was never used. Ultimately it proved to be folly but sometimes you can't take the risk of not acting.
 
Before you could say they had an alternative and picked the wrong option. With regard to the divers it was really a case of it must be done. Likewise with the miners digging under the plant to install the heat exchanger, even though it was never used. Ultimately it proved to be folly but sometimes you can't take the risk of not acting.
I don't think I explained myself correctly. With regards to the divers, I totally agree that it was a case that had to be done and I agree with such stoicism.

Personally, I have strong experiences of 'duty' and the need to look beyond our own needs and I commend and support such behavioural traits,

My point was (probably not well explained) that the Soviets used it blankly to manipulate. We need to keep up the Americas so make it cheaply... it must be done.

We know there is a flaw but we will keep the plants working anyway, as it would undermine our politics and we can't look weak... it must be done.

The Soviet people suffered some real hardships because those above them used this stoic behaviour to maintain a firm grip of their power base.
 
This was an interesting listen. Features writer/creator Craig Mazin.

 

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top