Transfer window financials

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Barry signing does makes sense, according to statistics.

The teams that pay the most wages, get the best results.

So getting a Barry on £120k a week, is better than getting a Capoue on £80k a week, and £9Million !!!
 
It's mainly a joke becuase we didn't pay that for him yet people keep saynig we did.

It's a joke really.

People seem to want to make it easy for the board to insist we spent more than we brought in mate, its the only way i can see why Barry on 100k 3m loan fee for lukaku and kone cost 6.5m and robles cost 2m gets bandied about for
 
For us to pay Barry that makes about as much sense as a layer of onions in a trifle.

also mate wasnt felli on 75k a week not 86k, doubt chebs was on 30k either, doubt alcarez is on 30k, certain were not paying 96k for barry, or 40k for kone and think 25k for delefou is prob wrong also, theirs also a big difference on how transfer fees are payed, i think most of ours are usually over 3-4 years anyways and think the felli one to us was mainly up front wasnt it?
 
also mate wasnt felli on 75k a week not 86k, doubt chebs was on 30k either, doubt alcarez is on 30k, certain were not paying 96k for barry, or 40k for kone and think 25k for delefou is prob wrong also, theirs also a big difference on how transfer fees are payed, i think most of ours are usually over 3-4 years anyways and think the felli one to us was mainly up front wasnt it?

Exactly. Just mad guesswork. You can pick three newspapers up and read three different things.

Best to look at how we normally operate and go from there. We do not pay people almost 100k a week.
 
I got a cone for 99p in 1994, therefore I believe it's based on sound market intelligence.

images


I reckon that fella would score more goals.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top