transfer prices

Status
Not open for further replies.

tadpole

Player Valuation: £15m
It seems like every time that we're linked with a player, or buy a player, everyone's obsessed with how much he's going to cost us.

It's all a bit strange. The only discussion that matters is where the signing will fit into the team, what strengths and weaknesses will he bring, will he improve us.

If we're splashing out money on someone with potential to be a big star for us, can't we allow ourselves more excitement and less worrying about the price tag ? Here's five reasons not to worry :

1. Chill - it's not your money that's being spent !

2. We don't know how accurate some of these news stories are when it comes to the details, and in any case, transfers are far more complex than the headline price suggests. Agents fees and wages are a big part of any transfer. Most fees are repayable over a period of years, they're not paid in full there and then. And that's without all the add-ons that we so often see when young players are being bought.

3. This isn't 2003 ! The club's accounts are as healthy as they've been for a long time. We get shedloads of money through TV rights alone. And we have Moshiri to step in when needed.

4. The PL is full of clubs with money who are looking for the same things : players with pace and ability who've shown they can deliver at the top level. That's why prices are going through the roof, especially for attacking players. We're doing pretty well developing young talent, but do we have another John Stones ? There's no guarantees. From all our crop of English U-21 and U-20 players, not one of them was close to making Southgate's WC squad. So we can't just rely on the kids, we have to be prepared to spend serious money if Everton are going to progress under Silva.

5. Some fans moaned when we bought Lukaku - they said we were paying over the odds ! Look at the goals he gave us and the profit that we made on him. If a player's good enough, and has got the right attitude, then the money is just a detail (and there's a fair chance that he'll repay the investment one way or another).
 
The problem with last summer's spending was mainly that we bought the wrong players, sometimes in the wrong positions. There was general consensus (a) that we needed to bring in several new players, and (b) that we needed to increase our squad size as we'd be playing in Europe.
 

We will be free of the RS and the other billionaire clubs within 5 years. They have been agitating for a European league for years and with salaries at their present obscene level it is inevitable they will take off with the TV coverage and permanentt membership of an elite league and never have to bother themselves with games at Bournemouth and FA Cup and League Cup dross. I will be happy when they have gone and we can play in the new English First Division without them. We could be champions again in 2025/26
 
It matters because if we mess up again like last season WTF do we do?. £50m on some half a season 21 year old is ridiculous and at the minute where a laughing stock. If the rumours are true then were paying this kid 105k a week WTF.
 

It is a shame the club does not have the advantage of the expertise on this site when choosing new players and knowing how much to spend. Such talent and knowledge going to waste here. Perhaps they could form a regular forum so the owner and the manager can have the benefit of good advice from those who know far better?
 
Getting good quality is important. But so is getting good value.

With Richarlison I think it’s a big risk because of his last 6 months of the season (the majority of it!). However, I think it would be a risk worth taking if we were getting him for £20-25m. For the prices quoted, we should be signing proven, top quality players. Not 21 year olds who might get better or might get worse.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top