You have no idea what the breakdown of figures are for those now detained in police cells as opposed to those bailed.
As for the claim they've charged and and released those with 'lower level' offences: what does that mean, 'lower level'? They threw half a hose brick through a mosque window rather than a full one? What would be categorised as 'lower level' offence...in a 'kin riot?!
It's not use Starmer blaming the other Tory Party for their failure to build more prisons, btw. That might well be the case. But he's the one who tried to look like Mr Tough Guy to the country by demanding long sentences and a huge operation to find hundreds and hundreds of people to charge...which then placed the system at breaking point again and has resulted in his government's u-turn.
This feller and his nodding dog cabinet haven't got the sense they were born with. Political pygmies.
Lower level means exactly what it says, offences that don’t carry meaty jail terms, such as affray.
If you care to peruse the Public Order Act 1986, you’ll see that the definition of throwing a brick through a mosque window during a riot, would fit the legal definition of violent disorder, which is what virtually all of them have been convicted of, not the much lesser offence of affray.
As for those being detained in police cells, pending the freeing up of jail cells, if you care to put down your left wing comic, the Morning Star and watch the national news, you’ll see that those given custodial sentences haven’t been freed as you claim and are in fact still in custody.
Also your weird fixation with Kier Starmer is starting reach the levels of tedium again that got you your last ban, so how about dialling it down a bit ?