We currently have owners who invest nothing.
We have owners who are happy to be average and don't want improvement.
We own practically nothing of our own, under these owners...
Our commercial deals have been absolutely awful.
we have..3.. failed stadium moves..
and none of our board have any business plans what's so ever.
So forgive me if i think that these people are actually better than what we have, because even if they are a bit shady it wouldn't take much at all to out do our current board.
If kenwright owned the pardes or whatever they probably would have ran him out the country.
So you would be happy with owners who go the other way and claim personal ownership of property they haven't invested in (moores owns stadium, didn't pay for it), no investment hardly in the team (drop down league, for example newcastles model).
Or better yet, instead of owners refusing to sell to us, imagine having an owner who prices the club so high that no-one in the world would buy us? Over 15 years he added about 500 million dollars onto the price of his baseball team so the club can't be sold to anyone as the lack of progression and success on the pitch under him makes the club pointless.
the board right now are tits, but you would be happy with an owner who is buying us simply to pocket the extra tv money coming in rather than actually wanting to develop us?
what i am saying isnt speculating anything, this is literally what this fella has already done once, and profited a hell of a lot because of it at the expense of his team. I'm not saying it will happen to us, or that we are being bought for shady reasons, but considering the amount of money flowing into the club as of next year, it wouldn't be too far from the truth based on his previous record.
remember when them lot got a us owner and it all went tits up and nearly bankrupted them? not too far different a situation.