I think people are missing the point about Robles.
It is not about how good a goalkeeper he is at present. It is more about how good a goalkeeper he can become.
He has had a hard time of it at Everton, for a couple of seasons he was understudy to Tim Howard and probably rightly so.
Last season Howard was very poor, got injured was replaced by Robles who was a far better but was still replaced by Howard when fit.
This season RK signed Stekelnburg and played him as first choice until he got injured.
This time however, the manager has kept him in the team after Stekelenburg returned to fitness and that is all down to form and a growing confidence.
I think he has the potential to be a top quality keeper and he is still very young.
I don't ever see Robles being a top keeper
I think he'll be a decent one for a mid table PL side (which is essentially what we are currently) but I can't see him being keeper for a top table side (which is what we're aspiring to be)
If we want to be a top side then we need better. I'd be just fine with keeping him on the books as back up, but I think people are being overly optimistic to think he'll be any better than that for us
If Robles is still our first choice keeper next season it will be because we've failed in the transfer market
I'm happy for Joel that so many people are in his corner, as he seems a good bloke, but it's supremely misguided IMO, and I don't think it actually helps him in the long run, especially when apologists try to excuse things like his poor kicking. It doesn't get to the root of his flaws and essentially gives him a "free pass" for them. That happened with Deulofeu too, and how did that work out for him?
All just an opinion of course