Brave decisions are starting your best players rather than putting out lineups designed to do nothing but stifle the game then try and win it from the bench. That's what he did first season. It was McCarthy Barry Barkley boring everyone to sleep for 45 mins then he'd bring on Osman or Pienaar to find a way to break the team down. Second season he did the same but had no options off the bench and injuries so we were just conceding but had no way to turn it round. This season it's been a mixture of both, beaten by United and City before the subs could do anything, settling for draws v Liverpool and Spurs rather than making bolder substitutions to win the game, and throwing Hail Marys against Warford and West Brom to claw back points that looked beyond us.
We've started with a correct first 11 twice this season v Southampton and Chelsea (I'll give Martinez the benefit of the doubt that Besic would have got a hattrick) . We were at it from the off with the correct tactics and everyone up to speed. In every other game though we've come out looking half asleep in the first half and that includes the cup games. We've conceded first loads of times home and away to poor sides. A top manager should put out the correct team more than 50% of the time. You should have a clear way of playing, an 11 you trust, and a confidence and consistency in performance at home. We have none of these things. Martinez will not budge his midfield two but considers the wide spots to be a free for all open to whoever comes out of the bingo that week. Kone and Cleverley bizarrely started the season over Mirallas and Del. once Kone hits s bit of form he disappears to be replaced by Deulofeu who is flying until one bad half v Liverpool and he loses his spot to Lennon. Is any of this ridiculous musical chairs doing any of them any good? I won't even get into Naismith and Barkley playing out of position. Meanwhile Gibson and Mirallas who I consider to be two of our top players are sat on the bench for the biggest games of the season. Why, after coming on against WBA and producing arguably our best football of the season, was Gibson not brought on v Spurs and Liverpool? Why is Mirallas one of our top players not starting over Naismith who is out of position. Why is Gareth Barry playing every game at the age of 35? Why is Howard allowed to stay in goal error after error whilst Robles was axed after three clean sheets?
These are not brave decisions. It is boring conservative safety first dirgeball that occasionally gets exciting when Martinez is forced to go all in. We could be playing like the second half of WBA most weeks but Martinez refuses to play the necessary combinations to play this way unless he is two down.
Think about it, the best football we've seen under Martinez has been the exact opposite of the philosophy he spouts. A plethora of direct free kicks, Barkley running the length of the pitch, Gibson finding Deulofeu with a spayed ball who crosses for Lukaku to head in, long balls from back to front that Lukaku has got on the end of, our counterattacking in Europe. Martinez does not even promote this, it's the opposite of his slow measured build up keeping possession and bringing the full backs into play. Nearly every match we try this for 60 mins, realise we're getting nowhere, sack it off, and just go gung ho for a result. It's crazy crazy football and has only worked (when it does work which is not often enough) because Everton has very good players and an exceptional defence personnel wise (of course Martinez deserves half the credit for this). If he played this way with a mid table team they would go down (as Wigan did).
Start the right team from the start and show you can win games at home in a consistent manner. That is what brave top managers do, not making themselves out to be tactical geniuses for saving games when it is they who botch the starting 11 every week.