Having had a bit more time to think about it,
Moyes putting Neville in midfield was probably the wrong thing to do. I say probably only because we don't know yet just how match fit Mirallas is. He said himself recently that he's not ready so maybe 70 mins was a bit beyond him at that point. Either way, when we look back, Neville was simply not the man to do the job, especially against WBA. Whether that solely cost us the match is another point entirely.
Many have said that the idea of Gibson meaning so much to the team is worrying. I don't think, had Baines, Felli and Pienaar turned up at all, his absence would have seemed to hurt us as much as it did.
As for
Moyes' post match comments, I was disappointed that, on the face of it, he'd be so demoralised after one bad performance. However, I'd like to think the comments were out of frustration and to be fair, if we'd not gone for attacking subs, perhaps the centre of midfield wouldn't have been so exposed and we'd have got a result more like what we did last time we played there, because at the end of the day, when our creative players aren't being creative, all we're going to do is hand possession back to them in the final third and be punished on the break while struggling to keep possession. That's exactly what happened. Going more attacking when you've not got the quality, is asking for trouble, see Holloway.
As for what the comments mean for the future, I think if we're just being really unlucky and battering teams, he's hardly going to take the foot off the gas until we score. Bringing on attacking players didn't work any more than bringing Neville on. Our top players were gash and unfortunately we don't have a bench full of world beaters to call upon.