Why the Obsession with other teams stadium capacity? It must only be because of ego and nothing to do with design. What matters is what's best for EFC. The truth is nobody knows what the right capacity should be, but if the intention is to have a "crowd on top of the players" intimidating atmosphere, than the best way of achieving that is having a sold out ground every week.
So if the choice is, having the biggest or one of the biggest capacities, but with 5,000 empty seats every game or a lower capacity with a sold out baying crowd every home game I know which I would prefer.
Almost everyone agrees that steep stands and closeness to the pitch are design essentials to create the Intimidation factor. However that's only going to work if the ground is packed. If there are loads of empty seats it defeats the point of the stadium design.
Do posters on here advocating for 60,000, 62,000 or 65,000 capacity stadiums seriously think we will get that every home game and so fulfilling the stadiums design criteria? I'm not criticising I'm just asking the question. As a layperson and a blue for over 50 years, taking my rose tinted glasses off, I must admit I don't think so.
I may be wrong but my personal opinion would be to go for a 56,000 to 58,000 capacity stadium which would be packed out every home game with an incredible atmosphere and the worst place to visit by any away team.