So Coleman was never a good a player?
Unbelievable
No. Read through the series of posts. Coleman has never been one of those players that had very few flaws to his game, he had a few. But many of his physical characteristics (bar height), so dynamism, engine, pace etc compensated for these. There is no shame in that, that applies to many players in football.
I say elsewhere that he was a good player, I also said I don't worry about him being back-up for a couple of games but with him the way he is now, I would be really worried if it is for an extended period.
People are very sensitive over Coleman. He has been a good player for us and a bargain at that. But he has been inconsistent for a few years now and this has coincided with his physical characteristics waning. The same people will be moaning that we aren't doing very well if Coleman is in for an extended period. Again, he is fine as short-term back-up but long-term is very problematic. He also had a variety of flaws - I also don't see the problem in saying that. The comment on his man-to-man marking was not to say it is literally the only thing he can do, but rather, that is his one remaining really top level attribute in my opinion.