• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Man United not paying staff a living wage

Status
Not open for further replies.

Prevenger17

Great turn of pace, an eye for goal...
Man Utd face pressure to end 'grotesque' failure to pay Living Wage while Alexis Sanchez earns £600k-a-week
share
TELEMMGLPICT000152975300-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqplGOf-dgG3z4gg9owgQTXNueSipGCXp8qRa9eYB8xX4.jpeg

Alexis Sanchez has become the highest paid player in Premier League history

  • Ben Rumsby
1 FEBRUARY 2018 • 12:01 AM


Manchester United will come under major pressure on Thursday to end their “grotesque” failure to pay all workers there the “real” Living Wage after making Alexis Sanchez the highest-paid player in Premier League history during the transfer window.

An open letter to the executive vice-chairman of the world’s richest football club, Ed Woodward, will be handed in at Old Trafford at 10am urging him to address the plight of stadium staff campaigners claim are “struggling to make ends meet” and are forced to choose “between putting the heating on or a hot meal”.

Signed by community leaders, including United’s MP and the Bishop of Salford, as well as a senior fan representative, the letter will also be published digitally in a bid to attract further co-signatories and shame the club into action.

Tuesday’s activity, featuring a demonstration outside Old Trafford, comes more than four months after the Daily Telegraph exposed the extent to which a commitment in 2015 by Premier League clubs to pay an independently-calculated living wage to all permanent staff was being undermined by their ongoing use of cheaper casual labour.

The Telegraph also revealed in November that both United and Manchester City were facing political pressure to join Liverpool in pledging to ensure everyone who carried out work on their behalf would receive at least of £8.75 per hour.

Led by civil society alliance Manchester Citizens, part of campaigning charity Citizens UK, this action is accompanied by a release headlined ‘Manchester Divided’, which proclaims Sanchez’s signing has further exposed “a grotesque tale of halves”, in which five of the highest-paid players in the Premier League play for United or City - including Paul Pogba, Kevin De Bruyne, Romelu Lukaku and Zlatan Ibrahimovic - while “low-paid staff at the Theatre of Dreams are facing a real nightmare to meet the real cost of living”.

TELEMMGLPICT000152231084_trans%2B%2BYFziz8YEm6VE5aYFlxYehcCV40SDh93MGBUhENtEJ8E.jpeg

Both City and United pay their players huge wagesCREDIT: GETTY IMAGES
It also claims Sanchez makes almost as much during one half of football than the annual salary of some cleaning, catering and security staff who work at Old Trafford (£14,625), that it would take someone on the minimum wage 41 years to earn the £600,000 the Chilean takes home each week, and that his agent’s reported £15 million fee would be enough to fund Living Wage pay rises of almost £2,500 for 6,100 low-paid workers.

One such worker at Old Trafford, who did not want to be named for fear of reprisals, said: “We all share the same employer and it would be great if the club could think about all workers wages, from football stars to stadium cleaners and caterers.

“We understand footballers need to be rewarded, but paying a Living Wage to everyone working at the club would show Manchester United is not only a great club but a great employer as well.”

Reverend Ian Rutherford, chairman of Greater Manchester Citizens and City Centre Minister at Methodist Central Hall, Manchester, said: “As the winter transfer window closes, many workers at Old Trafford will be choosing between putting the heating on or a hot meal.


“We’ve heard many stories about the real cost of life on low pay for workers at Old Trafford, many of whom are employed directly and struggling to live with dignity.”

Neil Jameson, executive director of Citizens UK, added: “Not only is Manchester United turning a blind eye to the harsh realities faced by the undervalued low-paid staff it employs, the club seemingly has a bottomless pit to pay players.



“It’s time they showed leadership by getting their house in order and doing the right thing by those who work hard for them off the pitch.”

Kate Green, MP for Stretford and Urmston said: “I’m proud to be the member of parliament for Manchester United. I’d be even prouder to see them become a Living Wage employer and an example to other businesses in Greater Manchester.”

Declaring its salaries to be “competitive”, United said in response: “We have many variations of contracts in place due to the size of the club, although all permanent employees, whether engaged on a full- or part-time hours basis, are paid the Voluntary Living Wage, in line with the Premier League agreement.

“Staff welfare is very important to the club and we consistently score in the top quartile of employers measured in independent surveys on staff satisfaction.”

Chelsea, Everton and West Ham United are the only accredited Living Wage Employers in the Premier League, with Liverpool poised to join them after committing to paying at least £8.75 per hour from this summer.





Maybe the cleaners could put on a number 9 shirt and not turn up for work? Potentially a 6 figure salary in it for them
 

"What you doing with your cleaners money this week?" " Buy some groceries and that's it gone"
"What you doing with your wages this week Alex?" "Buy about 10 houses in Moss Side"
 
Fans and non-footballing staff are always at the bottom of the food chain.

Some of the earnings are crazy, and probably U18 players are even on thousands per week?!
 
Man United not paying staff a living wage

And that's why they're the richest club in the world. And why Jeff wotisface from Amazon is the richest man in the world. And why Apple is one of the richest companies (what with their chinese factory workers having high suicide rates).

Money-making is a moral sickness but because money is more powerful than anything else in the world there's nothing to stop it.

I'm in business myself and from experience 99% of people out there are fine, fair people who would never think of treating their workers like Man Utd or Amazon or Apple. Alas, we'll all never be rich with an attitude like that.

Thankfully there are a few exceptions: some hugely-rich people do genuinely want to do good and look after people, and conversely the odd very modest businessman just wants to rip people off. But generally there's a filthy pattern out there in the world of money.
 

Notice Everton are already doing it. We may not be the best club on the pitch but we sure as hell know how to lead off it.

We’ve only just started doing this and we’ve got a chairman who’s regularly been sued for hiring and wage issues so let’s not let our love of Everton blind us to the huge disparity in wages at the club
 
And that's why they're the richest club in the world. And why Jeff wotisface from Amazon is the richest man in the world. And why Apple is one of the richest companies (what with their chinese factory workers having high suicide rates).

Money-making is a moral sickness but because money is more powerful than anything else in the world there's nothing to stop it.

I'm in business myself and from experience 99% of people out there are fine, fair people who would never think of treating their workers like Man Utd or Amazon or Apple. Alas, we'll all never be rich with an attitude like that.

Thankfully there are a few exceptions: some hugely-rich people do genuinely want to do good and look after people, and conversely the odd very modest businessman just wants to rip people off. But generally there's a filthy pattern out there in the world of money.

Agree totally
I work for a large multinational company
When it was British owned by a Quaker family it had some values and morals and treated its workers well
Now under American ownership it’s a race to the bottom and the mighty dollar rules every decision
 

Funny how these firms cant give you a decent pay rise or bonus for years but, like mine, can always find a few billion pounds for another take over. They make no secret of the fact that 'shareholders come first'.

I always think a good yard stick, is the turnover of staff at a company.

High turnover > Pay and conditions bad.

Low turnover > Pay and conditions good.
 
We only started paying the living wage a few months back didn’t we?
I thnk us and Chelsea have been doing it for a while, but regardless of the time it's been going on for, the fact remains that we pay our staff higher than some other clubs, and voluntarily so.

We could get away with paying people less by law, we just don't.

That's good that.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top