How much dd we get for him?
his service
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
How much dd we get for him?
a different level? I think that’s just you. Two different types of players in two different eras of the Prem. one a winger who could slot, one a striker who can slot.
Even if we were trying to sign Lukau( which we are not) and he would come to us(which he wouldn't) , where would you play him in the team ?
I could not see him as a pair with DCL and there is no way DCL is being left out of the team.
Lukaku will stay in Italy where I think the slower pace of the game suits him better.
Even if he does leave it will be for less money than Inter paid which then was less money than Utd paid... I cannot remember if we paid less money to sign him from Chelsea than they originally paid...
No player walks into any team unless he fits into the managers plan. Why were Utd happy to sell him on at a loss only to bring in a loan player from the Chinese league ?absolute if you think lukaku wouldn’t walk into our team.
Incredibly Ill advised short term thinking?No player walks into any team unless he fits into the managers plan. Why were Utd happy to sell him on at a loss only to bring in a loan player from the Chinese league ?
My problem with Lukaku is that he needs the team built around him so that he can score lots of goals... which is limiting for a team. That largely was his problem at Utd where that didn't happen.
I am not saying he isn't a good player but not a player I would want back at our club for the kind of money he would cost.
To be honest for that kind of money I would want better. I would want a player with more mobility and a player more interested in the team performance than his goal scoring record.
You may disagree but that is my opinion.
Which part, and why ?Incredibly Ill advised short term thinking?
Selling him so soon, because as history shows us, they were one rashford injury away from being forced to scrape the barrel for anything resembling a premier league forwardWhich part, and why ?
The problem was that he was no longer a regular first team starter and the longer they kept him the more his value would fall. They made a loss as it was.Selling him so soon, because as history shows us, they were one rashford injury away from being forced to scrape the barrel for anything resembling a premier league forward
But wasn’t it great to see his rubbish performance on his return to Goodison? Oh how I laughed!We kind of asked for it like by booing him relentlessly
Wayne Rooney was a far better player than Lukaku in almost every way.He’s the best striker and possibly even player to have turned out for us in the past 25 years hands down. This “bring him home” stuff is embarrassing however as he was and remains much better than us. If we wanted to have kept him maybe we should’ve shown more competence up and down the football club instead of just saying “this is when we push on” without anything to back it up. I’m sure seeing players like Niasse and Martina turning up to training showed him the level of ambition Everton actually had and made his decision on a new contract really quite easy.
He absolutely was. Not for Everton though.Wayne Rooney was a far better player than Lukaku in almost every way.