Head in hands.
He was never this bad. He has really declined. Needs to be taken out of the first team to get his head straight.
If we’re stuck with him for a few more years, we need to find a way to get his performance levels back up.
- Status
He was never this bad. He has really declined. Needs to be taken out of the first team to get his head straight.
If we’re stuck with him for a few more years, we need to find a way to get his performance levels back up.
What on earth does that sentence mean?
That our English international is worse than a dead loss?
davids
Player Valuation: £60m
Hope the lesson is learned. Two years with a big sell on clause should be the maximum.
What is a dead loss?
Something we’ve given up on, written off as a loss on the books.
Big Sams Undies
Player Valuation: £15m
Betting on Everton
Toffeelover
Player Valuation: £80m
Trust even Hart more than him, now that is saying something.
Given up on a player that hasn’t played a second of football for the club, wow. Tell you what there’s one goalkeeper at the club that’s given us a reason to give up on him right now.
Big Sams Undies
Player Valuation: £15m
If he can't get in ahead of Picko the Clown then it's safe to safe he's absolutely turd
Furey1878
Player Valuation: £70m
He was flying high after the world cup and came out of 17/18 with more respect than most in the team, but a 6 year deal was a massive overstatement of his worth.
Furey1878
Player Valuation: £70m
Think the club was desperate to get out of the "selling club" narrative, but at the end of the day if a team wants to throw silly money at a player then it should always be considered imo. There are very few players whose value to the club is much more than anyone would realistically offer. Right now only Richarlison is that for us, and even then Richarlison has proven his worth in his 3 years of PL football and handful of appearances for Brazil than Pickford has. Pickford looked good for a relegated Sunderland and a struggling 17/18 Everton, a keeper seemingly performing well at a struggling team can often be misleading.
I am not accepting that he’d be any worse than this short arse gimp has been.
orly
Please check with me for Blammo criteria
He didn't - he conceded 70+ goals, or nearly 2 a game.
It wasn’t my post in the first place, but the intended meaning was that Pickford was worse than Lossl.
I don’t know about Lossl, but I can see that Pickford has had a terrible season and is far from the player we saw a few years ago.
I didn’t think he was that great then, but now he is pretty awful.
- Status
