John Stones

[consho]

If Stones became available would you have him back?

 

[GwladysBlue]

Yes.

 

[Liam-EFC]

Definitely.

 

[tim cahill]

I wouldn't say no but I can't see it happening.

 

[maccavennie]

If Stones became available would you have him back?

Available as in on a free? Yeah sure.

City will want to recoup about 40m of that 50m they spunked on him. Don't think we'd be in the market for him at that price.

 

[sageyefc]

For the money there’s surely better

 

[ToffeeTim]

Yes

 

[paulbefc]

No. Not mentally cut out to play under the pressure you're under at a top 6 PL club and we need players that are.

 

[Neiler]

Always thought he would make a better center midfielder then a defender, always prone to a gaff, dont think he has really pushed on and fulfilled his talent and develped on what he was when he was here. Would depend on the deal, if there was any value in it id look at it, but its one of those i wouldn't be pushed on for anything over 20 odd mill and that wouldn't happen, given the numbers he went for.

So overall a no here.

 

[flibbyflob]

Not for the price we would have to pay to get him.

 

[4737carlin]

No
How many posts recently have there been about taking other clubs rejects and how we need to stop it.
We need to upgrade on Keane and Mina, not go for someone else who makes too many mistakes

 

[Connor]

All day and twice on a super Sunday

 

[DOMNOLAN]

The question is: “at what price and wage?”.

But if we’re only exclusively asking the question of: “is he better than Michael Keane?”, then hell yes!

 

[evertonarntwe]

Without a doubt

However, he's a bit of a tampon and he'll be in abar 200k a week

 

[ProZ]

No he’s a fraud and pep has seen through him just like he did Hart, we have enough defenders that can’t defend.