I said it's the only place where it is getting any traction. Most of the places I go on have been like "OK, whatever" about it.
Those links are just copying and pasting the original source in the main, a source that is not really a valid one anyway. Until I see any actual evidence of him saying it then It's merely worth a shrug of the shoulders.
That's not to say he hasn't said it either but I am not ready to to start calling him all sorts because some tickless twitter account said he said it.
What point are you trying to make by continually saying only people on this forum seem bothered?
I mean, you're wrong but I'm more interested in what relevance it would have even if you was correct.
Initially you said it wasn't worthy of being reported elsewhere, I've since demonstrated it's reported in mainstream media. The first I heard of 'the story' was a news aggregator as a top story from the Daily Mail...
Social media is flooded with it.
The articles I've linked have active comment sections which have plenty of comment.
What do you define as traction? Can you link these other cool places that don't care which are like "Ok, whatever"?
I don't even know your argument anymore. I don't even think you do?
1 . "It's a nothing story - nowhere else is reporting it"
2. "Yes they are, see here, here, here and here"
3. "Er, they don't count. I don't believe them"
?