Is Moshiri investing in the team?

Is Moshiri investing in the team

  • yes

    Votes: 418 73.1%
  • No

    Votes: 107 18.7%
  • Cheese on toast

    Votes: 47 8.2%

  • Total voters
    572
Status
Not open for further replies.

Because the only way we are going to improve is with investment. It's what we complained about with Kenwright and if anything Moshiri should be judged harsher because he's a) actually rich and b) he has just bought the club.

In my opinion as an owner he's not doing enough plus I'm also worried what kind of stadium we will get. I know people are saying it won't be as bad as West Ham but if it is designed to allow athletics I can't see how that won't compromise the design. I would prefer us to stay at Goodison than get a ground like West Ham (or that one we played in Tanzania the other day) and right now I don't trust him. The early hype has turned out to be mostly all lies.
 
Interesting developments on Twitter:

2i0buj6.png


And even the IMF seems to be weighing in:

352f9xi.png
 

Because the only way we are going to improve is with investment. It's what we complained about with Kenwright and if anything Moshiri should be judged harsher because he's a) actually rich and b) he has just bought the club.

In my opinion as an owner he's not doing enough plus I'm also worried what kind of stadium we will get. I know people are saying it won't be as bad as West Ham but if it is designed to allow athletics I can't see how that won't compromise the design. I would prefer us to stay at Goodison than get a ground like West Ham (or that one we played in Tanzania the other day) and right now I don't trust him. The early hype has turned out to be mostly all lies.
embarrassing.
 
Because the only way we are going to improve is with investment. It's what we complained about with Kenwright and if anything Moshiri should be judged harsher because he's a) actually rich and b) he has just bought the club.

In my opinion as an owner he's not doing enough plus I'm also worried what kind of stadium we will get. I know people are saying it won't be as bad as West Ham but if it is designed to allow athletics I can't see how that won't compromise the design. I would prefer us to stay at Goodison than get a ground like West Ham (or that one we played in Tanzania the other day) and right now I don't trust him. The early hype has turned out to be mostly all lies.

But if we haven't spent all the new TV money yet, why does Moshiri have to put his own money in? (even though he has already...)

And any particular reason why you don't trust him? Does he run a chicken farm? Is he a wanted felon in the Philippines? Did he buy the club then immediately leverage its debts up 10 times over to repay the money he borrowed to buy it? Has he been banned for all football activity for a year for breaching Agent transfer rules? Is he the owner of a buy-em-high sell-em-cheap sportswear PLC that abuses human working conditions in 3rd world countries and is constantly sanctioned by his shareholders?

Just wondering like how he stands against his peers for you...
 

The evidence is in the figures. Check net spend

I said last week that you'd come out with this as soon as Lukaku went. When we buy a new player or two, the net spend will become negative again. All irrelevant anyway as what matters is whether our squad is in a better position when the transfer window closes than it was at the end of last season.

For me, the squad is in a far better state, however we could potentially have a worse season if Lukaku is not adequately replaced. There are still a good 6+ weeks for us to try and strengthen in that area and for us to add to the threat that Sandro, Klaassen and Rooney will bring.

If the window closes and we have a positive net spend then I will back you in being frustrated. But continually going on about net spend as if it's the sole basis for success next season is getting tiresome. For example, hypothetically if we sold Niasse for £5m but bought Sigurdsson in for £50m then our net spend would be £45m. If we sold Niasse for £5m but we spent £30m on Sigurdsson + £19m on Giroud, the net spend would be bigger in the first scenario but we would be much better off in the second wouldn't we?

So net spend is not as important as you constantly make it out to be.
 
Because the only way we are going to improve is with investment. It's what we complained about with Kenwright and if anything Moshiri should be judged harsher because he's a) actually rich and b) he has just bought the club.

In my opinion as an owner he's not doing enough plus I'm also worried what kind of stadium we will get. I know people are saying it won't be as bad as West Ham but if it is designed to allow athletics I can't see how that won't compromise the design. I would prefer us to stay at Goodison than get a ground like West Ham (or that one we played in Tanzania the other day) and right now I don't trust him. The early hype has turned out to be mostly all lies.
Absolute drivel mate.
Moshiri has paid of the debt - in my book that's investment. We have already spent more in this transfer window than in any other, ever. We laso have plans to build a new ground - and have already bought the land.
You are obviously a conspiracy theorist, a dire pessimist and in desperate need of cheering up.Go and have a look at the list of players Liverpool have signed if you want (or need) a laugh.
 
But if we haven't spent all the new TV money yet, why does Moshiri have to put his own money in? (even though he has already...)

And any particular reason why you don't trust him? Does he run a chicken farm? Is he a wanted felon in the Philippines? Did he buy the club then immediately leverage its debts up 10 times over to repay the money he borrowed to buy it? Has he been banned for all football activity for a year for breaching Agent transfer rules? Is he the owner of a buy-em-high sell-em-cheap sportswear PLC that abuses human working conditions in 3rd world countries and is constantly sanctioned by his shareholders?

Just wondering like how he stands against his peers for you...
I don't trust him because it seems all he wants to do is make a profit. I don't think he would give a toss if that meant saddling us with a stadium none of us wants. Do you really want to sit in the stands and be miles away from the pitch? Honestly I would prefer to stay were we are.

That's not being a WUM. That's just a valid concern to have.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top