This charge gets a little bit of a different reaction from me. With the first one, there was anger at the league for the unfairness of the punishment, but there was also anger at the club for stupidly breaking the rules in the first place. We weren't blameless there.
But this time, it seems entirely likely that they're just trying to punish us twice for the same offense, in which case the club may have done nothing further wrong in the intervening period. So the anger should rightly be directed solely at the league and its spiraling corruption.