Seems to me Leicester are talking about a negotiated settlement as they dont want to be responsible for putting another club into administration.
Better news is the other clubs (burnley etc) are looking at suing the PL as the PL took so long to deal with Evertons case and hand out a penalty.
If you think about City and how long their case is taking and that they are 100% guilty of something the clubs will be lining up to sue the PL. May just make them buckle, change the points deduction to a fine for Moshiri and rethink this whole silly football destroying thing!!
Anyone logically will understand that if Leicester or anyone sue Everton then legally any good lawyer would say ‘what for?’. They will say, ‘now they have been found guilty of breaking the rules it means we may of stayed up’. Any good lawyer says, ‘would you have definitely stayed up?’…..
Leicester reply ‘we would have had a chance’. Everton reply, ‘so you can prove that chance was taken away from you because Everton broke rules based over a three year period?’, Leicester, ‘well there was a chance we would have stayed up’, Everton, ‘but you need proof so where is it? You only play Everton twice over 38 games so you could argue they had an unfair advantage in those two games however you won won and the other was a draw, soooooooooo?
Leicester ‘but, but, but…..’
Everton ‘you ultimately went down because over the 38 games you where worse then Everton, the fact Everton only finished a place above you shows they had no sporting advantage’. End of story.