Initial 10, then reduced to 6 + 2 Point Deductions

[Blue83]

It would be an independant regulator thats just set up by Governement, not run by them, just like financial services, ofcom, ofwat etc. You saying all those are rubbish?

Ofwat certainly are not fit for purpose given all the sewage dumping into our rivers

 

[Taifi gorm]

Look no further as to why city won’t get touched, independent regulation or not.

Then let's embrass the organisation next year. Sit down protest on the pitch next year for the city fixture, leave them one half to stand safely in but delay the game for 115 minutes.
Make the disparity, visible to the world, city's money couldn't wash away that.

 

[ForeverBlue92]

Oh look the PL and the UK Gov in shambles.

Which is code for let Man City and Newcastle do as they please and encourage US ownership to continue to turn football into soccerball.

Football is sadly heading for ruin in England unfortunately. Remember when a man could go the match to escape politics and financial accountancy ?

 

[sd_1992]

Im not really into all this legal stuff, so not sure how it all works. But in regards to Man Citys 115 charges, the prem appear to be waiting and will decide on these all at the same time. Why can’t they just break them up and do a few at a time?
Ours and forests were apparently quick to deal with as there weren’t many. Can’t that be done with Man City?
Probably a stupid question, I’m just curious.

Because Cities charges are likely just a witch hunt to please Kopites and United fans and will fall apart at the first bit of legal scrutiny.

We however roll over and take what we are given. Even Leicester have more balls than us.

 

[trueblue84]

Oh look the PL and the UK Gov in shambles.

The Tories won't be in power again in most of our lifetimes so it's a moot point.

 

[Wat Tyler]

The Tories won't be in power again in most of our lifetimes so it's a moot point.

Starmer is a Tory.

 

[Eggsyblueskin]

Could be wrong but I don't think they voted for the minutiae of the rules, they voted for some financial regulation. Bit like voting in VAR. They voted on the principle not the implementation. That was left to the PL

Wasn’t the issue that the clubs couldn’t agree to vote on the punishments for any infractions ?
That’s why it was left to the committee to formulate them in an ad hoc fashion.
Like I say , the PL was formed to serve the self interest of its founder members , no wonder it’s a myopic entity.
Abolish it entirely and start again, with something that acknowledges and accepts that the privilege of being on top of the pyramid does not negate the a responsibility to the welfare of the rest of footballing community.
PL was a bad idea poorly delivered.

 

[Eggsyblueskin]

Prior to Masters getting the job they interviewed 3 other people not involved within the PL.

He got the job simply for being available, kinda like how we now have Chongo in charge despite him not being fit for purpose.

Happy to admit that things might not get fixed, but those snake rats MPs wont fix it either.

Appoint a competent leader.

Wouldn’t work because however competent the leader he would be governed by the greed and avarice of the PL clubs.

 

[Goat]

Wouldn’t work because however competent the leader he would be governed by the greed and avarice of the PL clubs.

Stakeholders mate, they are stakeholders.

 

[NathDogg]

The Tories won't be in power again in most of our lifetimes so it's a moot point.

Yeah, meet the new boss, same as the old boss!

Keith will see to that mate, won’t matter if the tories are obliterated, which I hope and pray they are.

 

[Eggsyblueskin]

Could be wrong but I don't think they voted for the minutiae of the rules, they voted for some financial regulation. Bit like voting in VAR. They voted on the principle not the implementation. That was left to the PL

Because they didn’t want to be responsible for their own punishment, self interest governed their actions as always .
This is what happens when any organisation predicated on greed attempts to govern itself , abject failure.

 

[Jarvick]

Onana ?

That would be my guess as well, Onana may be Player 8 referenced in the IC decision.

 

[Eggsyblueskin]

Stakeholders mate, they are stakeholders.

Greedy bar- stewards is what they are .

 

[Blue83]

Starmer is a Tory.

New Labour is sugar free Tory

 

[MrD]

Listen to this ironically named bitter b*stard Gary Sweet, CEO of Luton town. What a club of whinging little tramps...