But why?
The club had a transfer net spend of circa £160 million last season alone bringing in about a thousand players and it kept them up. They have a hefty salary bill as well knowing full well about the FFP rules.
Everton's net transfer spend over the past four seasons has been close to zero!
Forest should be hammered in my view as there's no comparison in terms of which team unequivocally gained a sporting advantage.
Yeah Forest stayed up in a league thanks to their spending. Everton spent more and more and got worse. Baffled me when clubs that went down were apparently after us to sue but not Forest, seems a far easier case. Even if you see what we did for a defence as nothing but excuses, they are excuses all the same. Forest have literally no defence other than "we wanted to buy players so we bought them".
If we get punished at all then Forest should have the book thrown at them, that's not even being biased. Everton gained nothing but a stadium and lost out of sponsor deals that would've seen us easily within the limits, both of these factors shouldn't even be counted. I'm not joking here and this is mad, Forest spent >£275m (>£200m net-spend) since last year, on 51 players. That's insane. For comparison just by looking since 19/20, the year we bought Iwobi, Silva's second season, we've spent around £250m with a net spend of around -£40m since then meaning we've got that in profit. I'm also not going through it but I doubt that's on 51 players either, I'd be shocked if it was 25.
Long story short here, if Everton can be punished for that period then Forest are absolutely doomed given they spent far more in such a shorter space of time and all of it on transfers with no attempt to recoup money (aside from selling Johnson too late for it to count).