We were defo in for him mate.
Think it gives us a glimpse of the type of manager we are after, someone who can transition from a direct style of play to a progressive style of play like Potter did at Brighton and someone who will develop a "project" from the ground up.
As for Dyche, i think there are losses now either way - i think his positions now untenable after the Potter stuff - but who now is available to come in and what terms and how much do we have to deviate from the above to get them - the pool isnt great and we arent attractive right now frankly.
I don't see how Dyches position is untenable.
He has 5 months remaining on his deal. Like he said yesterday he's not stupid enough to think we'll wait until his contract expires and then start sounding people out. It's right that TFG have hopefully sounded a few people out, ideally (for them from a financial point of view ) I'm sure based on Dyche seeing out his contract.
If Dyche thought they'd taken the absolute piss, the floor was all his yesterday to resign with a bit of dignity.
He's not getting results, TFG considering their options. It's no big deal at all and is far better than sacking Dyche then drawing up a list.
I'm not even bothered if TFG have been in discussions for months on end with Potter with a view to taking over end of season. If West Ham have nabbed him well that's because they're a more attractive outfit currently because we've been a mess.
The only reason Dyches position should be untenable is because of results and performances, not due to us having ownership actually doing some planning in advance.