Gana and his technicolour football shirt (that he doesn't like)

Status
Not open for further replies.


An exercise for those who don't want us to sign Gana because of his monochrome tastes.

step one: list the 10 commandments (a religious text most on here will know well enough)
step two: pick the most abhorrent act on there (in your opinion).
step three: ask if you would openly support this.

consider that for someone who is deep into religion, these are directives from God which if broken send you to hell... you might understand why he might be against being forced to openly support pride.

you probably wont, which is why you're not as a tolerant person as you consider yourself to be, and should probably campaign for religion to be banned in this country.
 

Paul Rideout said:
An exercise for those who don't want us to sign Gana because of his monochrome tastes.

step one: list the 10 commandments (a religious text most on here will know well enough)
step two: pick the most abhorrent act on there (in your opinion).
step three: ask if you would openly support this.

consider that for someone who is deep into religion, these are directives from God which if broken send you to hell... you might understand why he might be against being forced to openly support pride.

you probably wont, which is why you're not as a tolerant person as you consider yourself to be, and should probably campaign for religion to be banned in this country.
Click to expand...
Wow. Super edgy.

Why don’t you consider that if a player is openly in opposition to the value of inclusivity that our club supposedly adheres to, the club shouldn’t employ him? The reasons behind his stance on the issue are really neither here nor there when you risk alienating a section of the club’s fanbase who will consider this a statement by the club on their rights to love whomever they choose.

And before you dive back in with your heroic defence of the Muslim faith, also consider that there are many, many Muslims who openly support LGBTQ+ rights and, at the time of writing, have yet to spontaneously combust.

Gana is free, and right, to believe whatever he sees fit. There are plenty of soulless football clubs around the world who wouldn’t think twice about employing him and the message that would send to supporters. I’m just disappointed that ours is one of them. Possibly shouldn’t be surprised, after the gambling sponsorship u-turn but here we are.

We most definitely need to drop “The People’s Club” moniker after this, though.
 
Paul Rideout said:
An exercise for those who don't want us to sign Gana because of his monochrome tastes.

step one: list the 10 commandments (a religious text most on here will know well enough)
step two: pick the most abhorrent act on there (in your opinion).
step three: ask if you would openly support this.

consider that for someone who is deep into religion, these are directives from God which if broken send you to hell... you might understand why he might be against being forced to openly support pride.

you probably wont, which is why you're not as a tolerant person as you consider yourself to be, and should probably campaign for religion to be banned in this country.
Click to expand...
Do you consider yourself tolerant?
 
woodsyni said:
Do you consider yourself tolerant?
Click to expand...
I don’t think it’s something you should self-determine. It’s an objective label not a subjective one.

I’ve lived on 3 continents with relative success/enjoyment (and I live in London which is practically non-U.K. in its over-arching attitudes) and so I guess there has to be an element of flexibility and acceptance of other cultures that I wouldn’t have if I’d have stayed in Merseyside.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top