Why the emphasis on one shot on target?
We had 15 attempts, 9 corners.
A good number of chances - had one cleared off the line, Richarlison's header, Mina's header, the cross Calvert-Lewin was on his heels for....
You can have 3 pens in a game, put them all wide - 0 shots on target but 3 bloody good chances aren't they?
Most blues I'm sure would share the view that we were unlucky.
I'm bothered about the shots being on target because to win football matches you need to score goals and to do that you need to get shots on target.
Our one shot on target was a piss poor header off Godfrey.
We could still be playing now and we wouldn't of scored.
442 didn't work, it hasn't worked all season. Yet here we are watching the worst hoof ball going.
Why was pickford kicking it up to townsend our smallest player while he's next to digne who was one of our best headers of the ball?
Why play townsend at all? He offered nothing. We know everything about digne and instead of playing to his weaknesses to give us an advantage we seemed to play towards his strengths.
It was an embarrassing display tactically from dunc and technically from the players.
We can't just sit there going "oh weren't we unlucky", we've been unlucky all season so we need to take luck out of the equation.
We need good tactics, maximum effort and skill. We showed none of that today.