They’re not academy players though are they? Browning (24) and Pennington (almost 24) should be nowhere near an academy. If they’re here past the 31st I’ll bet good money we’ll rarely see them. Just because we have them doesn’t mean we have to play them. If they’re not generating interest now whilst playing we may as well drop them. They’re only starting now for the shop window.
It’s just the same as Bolasie and Besic only we can’t risk putting them in the shop window as the stakes are far greater in a PL match.
I didn't say they were academy players though. I said, it won't help us run a successful academy if we just freeze players out once they reach a certain age. No promising 18 year old is going to commit to a 4 or 5 year deal if they think that they'll spend the last 2 years of that kicking their heels because we don't pick them for any team once we get bored of waiting for them to be first team ready, it's just common sense.
I'm not saying we should feel sorry for them or anything, simply that it's not a good business plan to hide away assets which are costing you money so nobody will take them off your hands.
I've already said, giving Browning and Pennington new contracts was stupid, you won't find me arguing there. The damage is done now though, and the only thing worse than giving Pennington a new deal would be giving him a new deal and then refusing to even play him for the under 23s. Same with turning down a £1million bid for Williams in January and then continuing to pay him for 2 years just for turning up to training.
That's before we even get on to the potential pitfalls of having to use under 18s in the 23s before they're ready, and then in turn having to pull players from lower age groups to cover their teams...
There's a lot more to think about when looking at the long term success of the academy than just whether a player currently in the under 23s is going to contribute to the first team.