That is fine. He is a half-wit.
very discriminatory to half wits, that comment.
He is an absolute no wit.
How he can milk a salary out of the BBC is completely mind blowing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
That is fine. He is a half-wit.
Mate, my ears were ringing...absolutely buzzing.I watched a 're-run of the game on sky the full match is it me or my telly but the crowd seemed muted.
In the match or watching on telly.Mate, my ears were ringing...absolutely buzzing.
I think the microphones are always set up towards the away end, not just at Goodison, but all grounds.I was there mate but I watched it later on I thought it sounded muted, maybe sky mess around with the sound I don't know.
at the matchIn the match or watching on telly.
Sorry to bring this up, my friend, but I couldn't help but notice you've ignored your own excellent 'rrh' advice here. Bank holidays, eh?. It's actually catarrh. And yes, it's one of those tricky words to spell, like 'diarrhoea'*
So, just remember that both catarrh and diarhhoea have an unusual 'rrh' letter arrangement in their spelling, and going forward, you should be good with both words.
*NB: yanks drop the 'o' and spell it diarrhea
I know it was at the match mate I am talking about on sky when I watched the game later.at the match
Oracular mate. I'll give you the Palace result for a small fee.Get this poster in the management team!
I think the decision was half made for them, the PSG result, Spurs still in the CL and Zinedan going to Real...who else is there.
How good they do the clear out / replace thing will be how long he stays
Short version; Woodward is the problem?.
United should have done the patently obvious and had a shortlist of proven managers who have improved players and teams at their previous posts and favour an attacking brand of football.
Common sense though hasn't featured very highly in some of their recent hirings and firings, so although this sounds as if its a given for any club, I wouldn't be absolutely certain with Woodward and the United hierarchy. Haphazard and spur of the moment, or responding to fan or media pressure, seems to be more their way.
I'm far from sure Pochettino was unattainable if they had really gone all out with money no object, he would have been extortionately expensive but 100% better than some of their other totally misguided investments, Sanchez which wrecked their whole pay structure and meant paying more on their other underperforming stars wages too.
After PSG both Spurs and United were still in Europe but hindsight was unavailable and Spurs victory over City hadn't happened yet.
Poch complained of a lack of any sort of level playing field with their main domestic rivals, they had stumbled in the league and fallen off the terrific pace set at the very top.
He was in the midst of his troubles with the first team decimated by injuries to key personnel including Kane, Son, Ali Davies etc.
Poch said he thought it five years before they could hope to compete properly and complained at being judged on trophies by the media with such inherant disadvantages.
Poch had practically been shouting from the rooftops 'get me put of here' as he recognized that Spurs ceiling and realistic limits for achievement may have already been reached.
Spurs have a rigid and relatively low paying wage structure most of their stars could get huge increases at virtually any other top prem club, a real handicap in attracting top new talent from abroad and especially in keeping their current stars too.
Eriksen may leave in the summer as his contract is up but the fear is he may be the first of many as each contract comes up for renewal.
Five years is a massive chunk in some of these stars' careers, there's no guarantees they'll still be there then and such competitiveness ever reached.
United by comparison are one of the biggest names and richest clubs around with huge revenue streams already in place, a move there would have meant full backing for transfers and being able to compete now and not in five years.
Pochettino's achievements at Spurs are truly remarkable but they are financially a smaller club than United and the wage structure and constraints on spending to give a ceiling even to the most ambitious dreams, United's ceiling is far, far higher and the possibilities endless.
The point with Solskjaer is he's unproven so you can't judge as he's been left these players.
He's unproven at transfers, integrating new players and building gradually a top side, evolving tactics as they go on and coping with the ups and downs of a whole season.
He's unproven so we can't judge now on no evidence?
Did United have to take a risk with an unproven manager?
No of course not
Pochettino, and they may have tried really hard or they may have just balked at the potential difficulty, and thought the easier and far more popular route easier to follow, was one of an obviously far higher calibre and proven ability who with better resources and backing would have a great chance of winning things, but there are other proven managers too.
What they needed was someone who improves players, is prepared to bring younger talent through if good enough and has an attacking style of football. Ideally he will have several years of experience of doing so and better still at more than one club and perhaps also clubs of differing stature.
Poch ticks all these boxes but other managers tick all or most too.
Ole failed at Cardiff, Pochettino was a success at Southampton, but Poch isn't the only suitable candidate.
Unfortunately for all he was a great player at United, he may be a success or a disaster as a manager.
United didn't have to take the chance, they didn't have to listen to the clamour from the fans and media, they could have at least been more sensible and waited longer.
They didn't.
Except when it's the RS.I think the microphones are always set up towards the away end, not just at Goodison, but all grounds.
Not really sure why they do it though.
I did hear Sky apologise for failing in their efforts to "blot out" out the obscene chants (from Utd) fans, so maybe there is a degree of sound censorship for what reaches viewers ears.