No, it's a pretty good predictor of how many points a team gets at an aggregate level. But it is of course correlated with other variables, but even adjusted for this I mean to remember, that it was one of the most robust variables. Especially if we separate the proportion of long balls, and measure teams that preferably use short passes.Keeping possession is just a stat to demonstrate a lot of tedious 5m sideways and backwards passing. Give me a team with a swash buckling, risk taking approach any day of the week so long as it works.
it's a pretty good predictor of how many points a team gets at an aggregate level. But it is of course correlated with other variables
What a load of [Poor language removed]. Does that mean the long ball merchants across the park are top notch. Shows us a graph mush.No, it's a pretty good predictor of how many points a team gets at an aggregate level. But it is of course correlated with other variables, but even adjusted for this I mean to remember, that it was one of the most robust variables. Especially if we separate the proportion of long balls, and measure teams that preferably use short passes.
Swashbuckling we are not.Keeping possession is just a stat to demonstrate a lot of tedious 5m sideways and backwards passing. Give me a team with a swash buckling, risk taking approach any day of the week so long as it works.
Liverpool is an interesting case. In the beginning under Klopp, Liverpool used relatively many long balls, but gradually they have become one of the teams with the most ball possession.What a load of [Poor language removed]. Does that mean the long ball merchants across the park are top notch. Shows us a graph mush.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.