Now people can argue that recent government's globally have done little to help the 'little people' but the question I ask is why is the new paradigm espoused by Brexit and Trump going to be any better for the very people who voted for it/them when there is no evidence to support the claim, and no evidence that the people behind the claims care about the people whom have just voted for them.
Great post but for the sake of debate:
The argument is what responsibility does the government have in benefiting the little people and how best to do so.
The coupling of BREXIT and Trump is indicative of competing systems of universal government and self-determination. I believe you once posted that leaving the EU would strip the rights of British citizens to move and work in other EU member countries. While that is true, what about the other side of the channel? Does it not give the UK the right to determine who, how many, and when immigrants may come to Britain and work? No longer would British society and economy be forced to support an unpredictable and unregulated immigrant force.
Last, "better" is highly subjective. Some
people find a car better based on its appearance and handling, others would prize reliability and fuel economy. There is no historical model for success for a strong government managed redistribution system. Restrained government and capitalism have the most success throughout history.
