Donald Trump for President Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
ilikecheese said:
Perhaps the university should be looking at their school and students to find out why a group of their students don't feel safe on their campus. Seems like there must be something fundamentally going wrong on that campus.
Click to expand...
I'll bet any racism isn't coming from white students.
 
RAFUH said:
Trump is caught on audio/video saying he does illegal things (grope women without consent): Never happened. He is just self aggrandizing. It is part of his pubic persona. There's no proof. You can't believe people coming forward now saying they saw/experienced it.

Democratic operative is caught on audio/video saying he does illegal things (voter fraud): This absolutely happened. Couldn't possibly be a guy self aggrandizing. It would hurt his reputation. There's proof. People have seen it.

The level of cognitive dissonance is astounding
Click to expand...

To be fair, I don't believe anything Trump says, but I'll believe these women accusing him of assault. It gets complicated, especially since they're such nasty women (although many are 6s).
 
wm02 said:
Not sure how it is in other states but here in Maryland during the primaries I was surprised that it was no longer computer voting and had returned to a paper ballot
Click to expand...

Voting is controlled by each state; not that you can't put forth the effort to manipulate votes in a certain state (ahem, Florida), but it would take a massive (huge) operation to work through this on even a single state level, much less a national election. According to this, there were 5,400+ polling places in Florida alone (in 2004). If each polling place has 5 machines (just a guess), we're over 27,000 machines to manipulate. It seems it would be difficult to manipulate this centrally since each polling place reports results directly, so you'd have to touch each of the 27,000 machines to affect an election. Seems like you'd know if this sort of thing were happening, unless you're the sort that really enjoys Dan Brown movies.
 
MartyMcFly said:
And that's the problem. You are voting for either.

1. Someone who is an ass especially around women but probably has the interests of Americans in mind.
2. Someone who is willing to do anything to get power including break any law she needs to. Ultimately anyone who is even thinking of voting fraud has no respect for the democratic will and that in my opinion disqualifies her.
Click to expand...

1409.gif
 
roydo said:
Do Mericans actually talk about policies in their elections?

It seems to me to be a toss up between someone who has a shady past who some accuse of criminality who supports a sexually abusive partner, and another who is accused of being a sexually abusive predator who some accuse of being ethically unsound and a borderline racist.

Great.
Click to expand...

Normally the entire debate is policies; promises of new policies and outlining why the other candidate's policies will fail. This election has taken a slight sideways turn.
 
Dylan said:
Funnily enough, I brought this up a while ago, and the Trump folks just ignored it.

So we elect a guy to be President, when his only interest is in the job title, not the job itself?

Yeah......no.
Click to expand...
We get the policies and supreme court nominations. Frankly I couldn't care less who does what behind the scenes.
 
ilikecheese said:
I suppose, but by the same token using the gay/cake shop analogy it becomes discriminatory.
Click to expand...
Twitter is banning Conservative journalists and no one is saying they don't have the right to do so. In fact everyone on the left say they are private organizations and as thus can decide who and what they allow on their platform.

Apple bans content it doesn't approve of all the time.

The cake shop wasn't refusing to sell a cake to the gay couple just refusing to print a political statement supporting gay marriage.

Being a libertarian I think the market would provide alternatives and it's probably best not to try and rub the noses of people who disagree with you since that doesn't exactly lead to a tolerant society.
 
MartyMcFly said:
Twitter is banning Conservative journalists and no one is saying they don't have the right to do so. In fact everyone on the left say they are private organizations and as thus can decide who and what they allow on their platform.

Apple bans content it doesn't approve of all the time.

The cake shop wasn't refusing to sell a cake to the gay couple just refusing to print a political statement supporting gay marriage.

Being a libertarian I think the market would provide alternatives and it's probably best not to try and rub the noses of people who disagree with you since that doesn't exactly lead to a tolerant society.
Click to expand...

Libertarians are socially liberal...you do not appear to be socially liberal at all.
 
ilikecheese said:
Perhaps the university should be looking at their school and students to find out why a group of their students don't feel safe on their campus. Seems like there must be something fundamentally going wrong on that campus.
Click to expand...
It's got nothing to do with feeling safe. They want segregated areas because black militants which is what they are want segregation.

They believe in the policies of the Black Panthers who wanted the same not Martin Luther King who wanted everyone to be viewed as equal and the same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top