Computer games.



Didn't they take 12 years to release it because they were getting it 'just right' ?

Absolutely ridiculous

Totally. Sad as it sounds, I waited with anticipation those 12 long years, and didn't even play it for longer than 2 weeks. Even tried to give it another go a few times, and just couldn't.
 
Didn't they take 12 years to release it because they were getting it 'just right' ?

Absolutely ridiculous

Indeed. Hence...

Totally. Sad as it sounds, I waited with anticipation those 12 long years, and didn't even play it for longer than 2 weeks. Even tried to give it another go a few times, and just couldn't.

... this, which is my feeling exactly. If the game was even half-decent I'd mark out about it, as I'm a bit of a Blizzard fan boy by my own admission, but it's pure turd it really is. There's a side of me that's glad Blizzard have at least acknowledged it as I was going to boycott their future products if they didn't admit D3 is bad. At least I now have hope that they'll develop a competent product in the future.

Been playing Final Fantasy IX recently. Vivi is one of my favourite characters through the whole series.

I've just actually bought that on Amazon for £10, awaiting delivery now. The only FF I haven't played!!!


EDIT:

Good article on D3.

http://www.slashgear.com/diablo-iii-is-the-worst-game-ever-made-09237780/

If you want a dungeon crawler, get Diablo 2 or Baldurs Gate - Baldurs Gate: Dark Alliance on the PS2 is 10x the game D3 is; for a console-based dungeon crawler to beat hands down a PC game is utterly absurd, but there we are!
 


Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top