BlueStevie35
Player Valuation: £70m
I mean he only returned to the squad on Monday so not that bafflingMade a positive difference when he came on, another baffling situation with the manager.
I mean he only returned to the squad on Monday so not that bafflingMade a positive difference when he came on, another baffling situation with the manager.
Yeah, he’s was playing loads before he was injured wasn’t he…………I mean he only returned to the squad on Monday so not that baffling
C'mon, you've been here for four years. You should know GOT by now.One of my favourite players in the current squad, I particularly like his tenacity. He does seem better suited to being an impact sub than a starter, and I do like seeing him named on the bench as he's potentially someone the manager can look to to come on and affect the game late on.
Not sure why this thread has such an angry vibe to it today, yesterday was a good day for Charley and I'm sure he's pleased at having contributed after a spell on the sidelines.
The problem here is if you want to make him the super sub, and I disagree that he’s “better suited” to that or whatever but I’ll play along, you have to put him on whenever we need a goal and early enough to actually have a chance to do something with it. Even if that’s what his role is supposed to be he’s still not been playing nearly enough.One of my favourite players in the current squad, I particularly like his tenacity. He does seem better suited to being an impact sub than a starter, and I do like seeing him named on the bench as he's potentially someone the manager can look to to come on and affect the game late on.
Not sure why this thread has such an angry vibe to it today, yesterday was a good day for Charley and I'm sure he's pleased at having contributed after a spell on the sidelines.
I don't make the subs mate.you have to put him on whenever we need a goal and early enough to actually have a chance to do something with it.
Talking about the manager mateI don't make the subs mate.
He's definitely an impact sub mate, he's a live wire suited best when tired legs are on the field..The problem here is if you want to make him the super sub, and I disagree that he’s “better suited” to that or whatever but I’ll play along, you have to put him on whenever we need a goal and early enough to actually have a chance to do something with it. Even if that’s what his role is supposed to be he’s still not been playing nearly enough.
He’s had enough strong performances even in his limited starts for me to not buy this.He's definitely an impact sub mate, he's a live wire suited best when tired legs are on the field..
He brings an extra boost with his drive.
But that gets lost as a starter, his allround game catches up with him..
Timing of the subs is always the issue..
We will always disagree on this one, so it's prob best just to agree to disagree.He’s had enough strong performances even in his limited starts for me to not buy this.
I mean I’ll stand by it still, he’s our best #10. Moyes seems to incapable of changing his view of any players so KDH will continue starting there when he should probably be deeper.
He hasn’t got an all around game strikes me one of those things you say to sound like you’ve got a real justification for something but it doesn’t really mean anything.We will always disagree on this one, so it's prob best just to agree to disagree.
If you can show me a game when he has started that he hasn't got lost in it, than go for it.
He hasn't got an alround game.
He has got a very good impact game, you cant carry his burst of energy over 90mins..
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.