On the BBC article;
[/URL]
... I'd have liked to have seen fan comment. Not anonymous fan quotes that feels kneejerk.
Also disappointed to hear Colin Chong defending the previous boards self preservation antics.
I'd like to ask
What criticism was unnecessary?
What was 'probably' inaccurate?
Why weren't the threats reported?
Why was a statement necessary? And why the timing?
You say now, it wasn't the majority and it was "one or two individuals" and In the same sentence
you defend this statement and the timing of it?
It was desperate self preservation,
as Ian Wright and other neutral pundits called.
Until this point I've been impressed with Colin Chong but those comments have irked me.