Don’t think it’s anything to do with if he’s good enough, think it’s more the carry on of people creaming over him slapping daft valuations on him and saying his potential is massive like he’s going to be some prime viera can you honestly hand on heart say his performances have been outstanding? Cause I can’t yes he’s young but still got so much to learn and add to his game.
As soon as Brighton rejected £70mil for Caicedo (and placed an £80mil price tag on him) and Chelsea paid £105mil+ for Fernandez it was pretty clear that Onana (who statistically is at the top end of a number of charts) would see a valuation increase.
He's the starting centre midfielder for Belgium, took the armband towards the end of the last game and was in their top 3 players in the previous two games (3-0 Sweden + 3-2 Germany).
Were talking about a physical monster, intelligent, high potential and only 21 years old starting for one of the worlds best international teams.
Hes moved clubs in each of the last 3 summers. Lille have a 20% sell on fee so for £70mil we would receive £62.6mil.
Im not sure why youre finding it hard to see his potential -- plenty of opposition fans and the media can see it....let alone our own fans!
Im also not sure why youre struggling with the valuation. The media are pushing strong interest from Chelsea and Arsenal...why wouldnt the fee be high?