allegedly allegedly

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kopite Ron Round wants to keep his nose out of Everton affairs. He needs to start looking to attract Tranmere to Kirkby because Everton wont be going. As Trevor Skempton said, if they couldn't get this fiasco through first time of asking then they stand little chance now when all the evidence will be seen by an independent party. Just on the transport plan alone this will be laughed out. And on the retail side of the equation for cross-funding purposes, we now have evidence that the more prestigious Liverpool One development is having to give away free rental to attract retail. A Kirkby stadium, according to the DK development team, only stands up if they attract enough retail. Free rental at L1 or paying rental to be next to Tesco in a run down Merseyside district? Hmmm, let me think.

It's a joke this is still ongoing, tbh.


The leader of the council were hoping to move too needs to keep his nose out? If isn't his business then whose is it. Didn't hear you tell that total idiot bradley to keep his nose out, i wonder why!
Posted via Mobile Device
 

The leader of the council were hoping to move too needs to keep his nose out? If isn't his business then whose is it. Didn't hear you tell that total idiot bradley to keep his nose out, i wonder why!
Posted via Mobile Device

Not being funny Halewood, but can I have that in English? :lol:
 

I haven't accepted anything of the sort. I don't believe that LCC's recent actions have been motivated because the current council leaders support Everton. On the contrary I think their concern is in part down to the fact that Kirkby will be attracting new investement that could have been made instead in Liverpool, and that the departure of Everton - a major business, major money earner and a significant employer, will negatively affect other businesses within the city. Not to say in part down to the negative impact the preceding will have on the electorate's perception of the council's performance. Natch, if Everton go, the council loses twice.

And I certainly haven't accepted that the leader of Kirkby council is attempting to lure Everton to Kirkby in order to make Liverpool FC the only club in the city. Frankly that's a very silly suggestion.
On the contrary I think Round makes it very clear that he views the projects stadium purely as commercial venture with the potential to regenerate the run down Kirkby town centre.

What I do accept - albeit from a very long way away and I stand to be corrected if this is not the case - is that until very recently LCC have made little or no effort to try and keep Everton FC within the city boundaries. And, that early informal indications of interest from the club in building a new stadium in Stanley Park were met with the response from LCC that there were legal barriers to building in the park which could not be overcome, which was, as we have later seen, not true.



I'm hoping you'll edit that so I can respond.So lets get this straight you can believe that a councillor who supports Everton will be underhanded in keeping Everton out of Kirkby .Yet A LIVERPOOLS FANS motives are above reproach.You really are a true blue! .I personally think ALL the politicians have their own agenda,The vast majority of people who live in Kirkby in particular the business do not want us there please feel free to check that out. So if this is fact as has been stressed to me who is the Kopite representing? as some one has all ready stated it would be far better if an independent body took the decision.
 

I wouldnt say a vast majority in Kirkby are against it. The vocal part are, such as business etc, but from what I'm told from family that live there the majority are for the move. The town needs regeneration and if the stadium brings it, they'll welcome it.
 
I wouldnt say a vast majority in Kirkby are against it. The vocal part are, such as business etc, but from what I'm told from family that live there the majority are for the move. The town needs regeneration and if the stadium brings it, they'll welcome it.

Is it not more the case of:

regeneration = yes please
stadium = no thanks

I think that's what even the mickey mouse local council consultation exercises were bringing out.

I think Kirkby will get its facelift without a stadium. As said mickey mouse council leader Ron the Red stated.
 
So lets get this straight you can believe that a councillor who supports Everton will be underhanded in keeping Everton out of Kirkby .Yet A LIVERPOOLS FANS motives are above reproach.You really are a true blue! .

<sigh> No that isn't what I said at all. I wrote it in English and repeated it again in English. I can write it again in Turkish if that would help.

The vast majority of people who live in Kirkby in particular the business do not want us there please feel free to check that out.

There's been a referendum, or just an opinion poll? And how many of the owners of the businesses affected actually live in Kirkby?

What is true is that the council that's backing the scheme was elected with a majority. I guess that says something. As I said in my initial post imo it's up to the people who live in an area which will be affected by a new stadium development to decide if they want it or not.

Given the vehemence with which the anti-Kirkby lobbby claims that Kirkby doesn't want the stadium, I wonder if what the result would be if the neighbours of GP were polled - bear in mind that property values in both Kirkby and around GP will almost certainly rise when both areas are redeveloped.
 
Last edited:

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top