I'm using the logic of the post I'm replying to, not judging him myself.
The point was that Sigurdsson was a 'bridging player' ie not good enough to take us to the level we really desire, but good enough to improve us at the moment.
I think Sigurdsson is a game changer, capable of elevating Everton to the next level.
Lukaku is a goal scorer, he is bad at everything else a footballer should be good at. Lazy, movement, ariel ability, touch, passing.
Somewhat true but his movement, aerial ability and first touch is currently miles ahead of Rooney's.
I would prefer him in the box defend set pieces over Rooney, I would prefer him in linkup play over Rooney, I would prefer him receiving the ball & running down the flanks or towards the box than Rooney.
But other than that? He's a goal scorer like you said, and that's his only job. Everything else is just a bonus IMO.
After watching those two videos, I feel like an idiot for ever being uncertain about Gylfi. Why on earth wouldn't we want somebody that can do those kind of things with a football??
Because apparently he's only good at taking set pieces and is worse in open play than Ross barkley and about 70 other Players in the league. Lol.
Because they are edited highlight Youtube videos. Watch a Barkley one.
You wont see him score, assist, through ball, cross or pass the ball like Sigurdsson does in any of those clips.
In fact, you wont find any other Playmaker on the planet doing this like him.
Yawn.....no more of this please.
Think you've well and truly made your point.
Getting a tad boring now mate.
We all want him to sign (well most do), we dont need any more of your justification.
That would be implying that I care about your opinion.
As you do.
