Search results for query: *

2 people, one of whom a more cynical poster might suggest has an agenda. He has played wing back in an emergency in one game for his club, if dyche envisions some sort of stones or zinchenko hybrid then maybe he is that option, as it stands we have two decent RBs and Garner is a promising center mid

He did fine there but he played wing back and had 3 CB's inside of him. Very very different playing in a back four

Played wing back

So he played wing back, not right back. It's a very different concept when you have 3 cbs. As I said he hasn't played right back for us. He may be seen as last gasp cover, I doubt he is being seen as first choice option. He won't be converted there long term unless he's not good enough at cm.

He didn't play it for Everton.

In 05 everything went through gravesen in a way it couldn't through a full back. Baines was a unique footballer, probably the best LB in the world for a period. Generally speaking center mids have a higher value and that is because its a more difficult position with a rarer skillset. Garner...

No manager worth his salt would seek to convert a talented midfielder into a full back. The influence and importance from midfield is greater than it is from full back and far harder to source in the transfer market.

You know full well this is not going to happen

I'd say that side finishes top 15 and beats some very good sides on their day. Obviously we need to reshaped the squad and strengthen or upgrade many positions.

Very good signing

Looks a really good footballer

Thought he looked good again, lots of promise

I know mate, have seen others acting like that

Despite what some posters think it is okay to like both, you don't have to slaughter one to praise the other!

Just looks a really correct center mid, bit of everything

He's got something about him, looks a decent footballer