Make this happen. Grealo! Grealo!
Totally agree, bit different to Dele, but the vibes are very much there.If he’s on it for sure, now he just gives off the same vibes as Dele. Given up performing at the level required and now coasting to the end.
Why would anyone want from Grealish to do what he's never done in his entire career? Or McNeil for that matter, as most of his assists that you've posted are from corners/set pieces?You like the thought of Grealish being a creative winger who beats players with ease, gets the ball for the striker to tap in and scores Worldies!
Totally agree, bit different to Dele, but the vibes are very much there.
At his best, we have nobody close, but when was his best and does he have the hunger to get it back.
Buy low sell highFor me we need to start picking players on the way up not giving a home for those on the way down.
.
I don't believe we have a single player better than Grealish in our squad, personally.
Italy I suspectHe’ll rock up at Villa I reckon. They’ve recently shown a willingness to pay a large percentage of wages for loanees (Rashford/Asensio), have European football and are his boyhood club to boot.
Steven Pienaar never had good numbers. We would take him back in his prime in a heartbeat. I'm not sure about taking Grealish but I am sure football is more than stats.He hasn't put up a good season numbers wise since he played for Villa in 20/21. That's a long time ago.
We have absolutely no right wingers, 1 right back, and 1 centre forward. But what we really are in desperate need of, is a 4th number 10 who likes to cut inside from the left.
I like him and think he's not as finished as some people are making out, but I feel like signing him would blow up any wage structure we have so I'm not convinced on that alone. Even if he halved his wages I think he'd still be the top earner.
I think he will end up at somewhere like Newcastle, who can take a bit of a risk on a luxury player like him.
At Villa he played more in the middle. His strengths was driving forward, creating chances and running games. City have ruined him by playing on the left and being isolated….we have limited spend, we have priority positions to fill, we have limited loan contracts and yet we’re linked with a mega-expensive player who plays in a position where we already have a superior footballer.
All seems a bit odd to me.
Yeah but the feeling will be higher as a result of paying his wages. As a comparable example, Chelsea paid Man Utd £5m plus the total fee of half Sanchos wages, which was £150k a week. That comes to £6m on the wages alone. It's rumoured Grealish is on about the same wages I believe (£300k).He wont break the wage structure as we wouldnt be paying his wages.
A fee is paid to City. They are the ones who continue paying his wages.
Yeah but the feeling will be higher as a result of paying his wages. As a comparable example, Chelsea paid Man Utd £5m plus the total fee of half Sanchos wages, which was £150k a week. That comes to £6m on the wages alone. It's rumoured Grealish is on about the same wages I believe (£300k).
So if the deal was anything like that, you're talking over £10m just to have Grealish at the club for a year. Is he going to be worth 3 places in the league table on his own, to justify that?