Why don't players look at the actual ball? Are defenders coached to turn their backs on it or are they just being stupid?
Do they get lambasted when the player they were trying to wrestle scores anyway because he knew the ball was coming and the defender didn't?
I've been banging on about Rashid for a while now. I was just coming to accept that maybe it should be Borthwick as a batsman who bowls a bit instead and they go and stick him in at last.
We've got so many competent all-rounders, and so few out-and-out middle order batsmen, that it just seems...
Should have been a comfortable target on this pitch, not now. I've been cursing the selection of non-scoring batsmen over all-rounders who do score for a while now. Ballance certainly wouldn't have been in my side and I'm not convinced about Vince either, although at least he has some technique...
Yes.
But more to the point Arsenal met Suarez's release clause and Liverpool just ignored it and said no anyway. There was no legal challenge, Suarez stayed and went a year later for about £30M more.
Nice to see Woakes doing well. Should explain up front I'm from Warwickshire, so we've known how good he is for a long time. Not sure there's room for him once Stokes is back though. I don't know if I'm supposed to want him to stay in the England side or come back and play for us.
Hi everyone, this is a nice discovery. Somewhere to talk about cricket with fellow blues. Maybe you guys will listen to me rant about how we should play either Borthwick or Rashid in place of one of the batsmen who never score any runs (looking like Compton now) and simultaneously strengthen the...
Its Park Ji-Sung. Sometimes we (er... evil capitalist westerners) change it to Ji-Sung Park because we're used to having the surname last, not first. Koreans put the family name first, apparently. His family are the Park family and his parents decided to name him Ji-Sung.