Under The Lights
ORDER NOW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
In America having an " intervention " seems to be the popular thing to do for somebody who is struggling in work or in life.
It seems that it starts by confronting the person with reality and if you can get them to accept that then you can move forward from there.
Something like that is needed with our manager at the moment. If he believes that picking the same team weak after weak and playing the same formation week after week and expects that somehow results are going to change significantly then definitely somebody needs to interevene… if only we had a DOF at the club.
Lads ! Everton being pulled apart. Talksport NOW.
He either has the clubs confidence or he doesn't, really.
My guess is that the relationship between Silva and Brands isn't at all like the relationship between boss and employee you would find in a traditional working environment. Silva is on a millionaires salary, I assume Brands is the same, and at that level, a manager is assumed to be competent enough to perform the role until the second the axe is wielded. The king is dead, long live the (erm... caretaker) king.
I'm sure there are targets and general reviews, but the minute Brands feels he has to sit down with Silva to discuss zonal marking and playing two holding midfielders is the time when Brands goes to the board and says we need to bin this guy.
Oh yeah we do we are massively underperforming. But even if we play good and beat all the top teams they always say it was because they was crap not we were good.We deserve it at present.
As I've just put above, after Sheffield United the board (and primarily Brands) should have been informally sounding people out. If they haven't started already that really has to be starting now. That doesn't mean you automatically sack Silva, but you get an idea of whether a manager would be interested, and in time whether the club will play ball.
You then have an easy decision to make. You either believe you can get better in, or you feel Marco deserves more time. (It could be both, for example it could be Arteta is interested and would come, but we feel we want to give Silva until Christmas).
Here's the rub though, you need to be acting decisively on whatever you decide. So if he is going to stay, start getting some stories out into the press about some of the things he's doing well and the benefits of being patient with a young manager. How we can only judge his team when he gets Gamin and Gomes fit etc etc. If he's not our man make the change now. Because of you wait 2 more games (and defeats for example) suddenly an Arteta may have a change of heart.
Any new manager will likely view the next 2 games as 4 points, potentially even 6 points. You take those games away, the fixtures turn a bit it starts to spiral.
What really frustrates me is this radio silence we get and the inane drift towards the end with managers. At board level it seems there is an enormous amount of cowardice. People who are either too scared to face down the fans and give them some unpopular news on a manager, or too scared towards sacking a manager.
My opinion- Think their both in the same bed together. Between them have settled on both praising each other when they are confronted in the boardroom. My problem thought is- If they both don,t go at the same time, will a new manager of substance be able to work with Brands with what he has done, and his methods since being here. which again in my opinion, is not a lot. Thoughts ?He either has the clubs confidence or he doesn't, really.
My guess is that the relationship between Silva and Brands isn't at all like the relationship between boss and employee you would find in a traditional working environment. Silva is on a millionaires salary, I assume Brands is the same, and at that level, a manager is assumed to be competent enough to perform the role until the second the axe is wielded. The king is dead, long live the (erm... caretaker) king.
I'm sure there are targets and general reviews, but the minute Brands feels he has to sit down with Silva to discuss zonal marking and playing two holding midfielders is the time when Brands goes to the board and says we need to bin this guy.
Its the four clubs above us that I don,t want to see start winning, As up to Sheff Utd we will have to mix it because on paper at moment we are in the same boat and same par as these four.Why do some of our fans want what’s bad for us? Some wanting City to beat us, wanting a club that could be a rival for relegation to win? I don’t get it. I can understand fans wanting Marco out but we've just lost ANOTHER game, another club winning isn’t going to increase the pressure more. I maybe being dramatic over mentioning relegation, 2 weeks ago I’d have said ‘no way’ but every passing week I honestly think it’s a possibility. Can’t score, can’t defend, weak midfield. I don’t want any of the clubs below us winning.
As I've just put above, after Sheffield United the board (and primarily Brands) should have been informally sounding people out. If they haven't started already that really has to be starting now. That doesn't mean you automatically sack Silva, but you get an idea of whether a manager would be interested, and in time whether the club will play ball.
You then have an easy decision to make. You either believe you can get better in, or you feel Marco deserves more time. (It could be both, for example it could be Arteta is interested and would come, but we feel we want to give Silva until Christmas).
Here's the rub though, you need to be acting decisively on whatever you decide. So if he is going to stay, start getting some stories out into the press about some of the things he's doing well and the benefits of being patient with a young manager. How we can only judge his team when he gets Gamin and Gomes fit etc etc. If he's not our man make the change now. Because of you wait 2 more games (and defeats for example) suddenly an Arteta may have a change of heart.
Any new manager will likely view the next 2 games as 4 points, potentially even 6 points. You take those games away, the fixtures turn a bit it starts to spiral.
What really frustrates me is this radio silence we get and the inane drift towards the end with managers. At board level it seems there is an enormous amount of cowardice. People who are either too scared to face down the fans and give them some unpopular news on a manager, or too scared towards sacking a manager.