Genuine question: this place for the past few weeks - is it really possible to have a debate? Honestly?
Dave you say you are interested in debate but you ignore posters when they make arguments you can't refute or you say pffft or sigh.
You don't debate points that take into account the quality of the victories and act as if beating Dagenham is the same as beating Chelsea
Dave we have beaten 2 teams who were above us in the league
You mention 2 cup runs when in reality in the league cup we were knocked out by the first decent team we met. We were lucky we didn't meet a good team earlier in the comp. it really is not a sign of progress
You bring up his first season and his average win %.
You say he is being judged by a different standard to other managers.
Yes he made claims which he hasn't fulfilled but what he is really being judged on is
5th -> 11th -> 12th
Is top half too much to ask (and please stop trying to whitewash 12th as mid table, technically right but come on we're bottom half)
Debate is 2 way Dave. You can't make claims and then fail to acknowledge others rebuttals. Pfft, sigh, fumeaggedon, plotters have no place in debate.
If your facts (opinions aren't facts) don't speak for themselves and stand up to scrutiny then don't resort to blowing people off.
Plenty make valid rebuttals of your arguments which you ignore and repeat the same pointless fact.