• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Erm, no. Sexual reassignment is a mix of surgery and hormone therapy that changes both the body and the chemicals inside the body. If she's gone through that she's anatomically female, whether you like it or not.

So "effectively" you're quite literally incorrect.

Not in the slightest mate. Not even close, females have a larger corpus collosum, men have larger brains by approximately 4% - also PLENTY of physical differences not just genitia differs. Like it or not mate, if you are born a man/woman you are going to be a such physically your entire life regardless of surgeries or whatever hormone replacement is administered.

Unless you are sexually dimorphic it is PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO CHANGE GENDER.
 

No, honestly, I really am laughing at you. Even more now. Why don't you have another beer. If you are married maybe your wife will be kind enough to turn you on your front after you pass out.


audience.gif
 
Not in the slightest mate. Not even close, females have a larger corpus collosum, men have larger brains by approximately 4% - also PLENTY of physical differences not just genitia differs. Like it or not mate, if you are born a man/woman you are going to be a such physically your entire life regardless of surgeries or whatever hormone replacement is administered.

Unless you are sexually dimorphic it is PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO CHANGE GENDER.

BOOM!
 

Just winds me up mate - if they are all of a sudden 'female' where is the ability to procreate, ie. Womb ovaries etc. The female of the species is exactly that, a vessel to reproduce offspring - gender reassignment is nothing more than cosmetic surgery.

Was Michael Jackson black or white? Looked like an ugly old white woman - he was in fact a middle aged black man. The reality and the 'appearance' are 2 different things regardless of what you choose to believe.
 
Point I was making is that in this thread, the target as it were, makes it almost have a different mind set than any other on GOT. And more latitude perhaps. If, for example, a LFC player came out as gay next week, I bet you a lot of beer that he would actually get hardly any abuse in here. Or if a LFC player suffered a death in the family, the same would apply.

Rightly so.

But this is different. It is not about gay/straight/trans sex. It is not passing any moral judgment on him. It is not even a discussion about it. It is a piss take from the gift that keeps giving.

No, I know it's not passing any moral judgement on him. It's taking the piss for sleeping with a transexual. Thus clearly implying that there is something wrong with being transexual. Thus prejudicial.

It's the equivalent of a blind white guy in Mississippi in 1950 sleeping with a black girl. To mock him would imply there was something wrong with black people. you might think you're mocking the white guy - and, of course, you are - but you're also oppressing the black girl by going along with the idea that sleeping with her is somehow "wrong."
 

Not in the slightest mate. Not even close, females have a larger corpus collosum, men have larger brains by approximately 4% - also PLENTY of physical differences not just genitia differs. Like it or not mate, if you are born a man/woman you are going to be a such physically your entire life regardless of surgeries or whatever hormone replacement is administered.

Unless you are sexually dimorphic it is PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO CHANGE GENDER.

Sorry, I have to disagree. Not with your knowledge but you're interpretation of it. This has gone impressively off-topic now so I'll be brief. You are assigned gender at birth, and this gender cannot be changed (I agree). However, you're not necessarily born into the body that matches your gender. That's a transsexual. The physical and chemical changes do change your sex to match your gender.

I'm aware there's a counter argument to that, but what I've said is a very basic and probably not too eloquent summation of a strong argument that's rooted in subjectivity. I see where you're coming from, I just simply disagree.
 
No, I know it's not passing any moral judgement on him. It's taking the piss for sleeping with a transexual. Thus clearly implying that there is something wrong with being transexual. Thus prejudicial.

It's the equivalent of a blind white guy in Mississippi in 1950 sleeping with a black girl. To mock him would imply there was something wrong with black people. you might think you're mocking the white guy - and, of course, you are - but you're also oppressing the black girl by going along with the idea that sleeping with her is somehow "wrong."

But it isnt mate. Thats the point. There is more of a comedic quality than prejudicial.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top